Haradinaj says he has not yet read Constitutional decision

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo has described Ramush Haradinaj's request as unacceptable over whether he had the right to call government meetings despite the fact that he had resigned irrevocable. Meanwhile Haradinaj has said he has not yet read the Constitutional decision. In the Court's Decision [...]
The Court's decision says cases raised by Haradinaj do not enter the scope of the Constitutional Court's jurisdiction.
This Constitutional decision on Haradinaj's request comes at a time when Kosovo currently has no Parliament, and when early elections are scheduled to be held on 6 October.
Meanwhile, Haradinaj has not yet seen the Constitutional decision, as by the time that decision was made, he has been at a meeting with PSD chief Shpend Ahmeti, whose party has made a pre-election coalition.
We'll analyze the finding decisions because I haven't seen them yet. I haven't read the verdict yet, nor do we ask for competencies, nor do the Government in resignation, have asked for elections, so that the mandate to return to the sovereign and hold elections in the country. For Kosovo not to remain in the government vacuum. That's why I turned to the Constitution, not for me. I have demanded that the warrant return to the sovereign at the moment of his resignation, so it is. I have resigned under the Constitution and Laws, but I can't leave the country in vacuum because I do criminal work”, said Haradinaj questioned by T7 at a conference after meeting with Ahmeti.
Constitutional Court ruling:
Subtitles: KO 124/19 Error: The prime minister (in resignation) of the Republic of Kosovo, the object of the issue of demand, was the interpretation of the act of resignation of the prime minister of the Republic of Kosovo and the definition of the government's competencies and functioning, following the resignation of the prime minister. The request was based on Article 10 in 93 [The Government Committees], about Article 113. [Jurisdiction and authorised parties] of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo. The court concluded that cases raised by the pre-requisite demand do not enter the scope of the Constitutional Court jurisdiction, as defined by Article 113 of the Constitution. Consequently, in accordance with Article 113, paragraph 1 of the Constitution, and with rule 59 (2) of the work order, the Court unanimously ruled: T DEATHLY request unacceptable.












