complaints against continuing detention measure against Currie and his guilty group are rejected

The Court of Appeals has rejected the complaints of defence lawyers against the Constitutional Court's ruling in Pristina on 1908.2019, whereby the detention measures of defendants Izet Osmani, known as “Curri” and his group I.B., A.Th., were continued. M.M. For another month. I.O., I.B., A. Th and [...]
The Court of Appeals has rejected the complaints of defence lawyers against the Constitutional Court's ruling in Pristina on 1908.2019, whereby the detention measures of defendants Izet Osmani, known as “Curri” and his group I.B., A.Th., were continued. M.M. For another month.
I.O., I.B., A. Thom and M.M., are being suspected by the prosecution because of criminal acts “feide”, “dectoration” and “masquerade”, these works punishable according to the Penal Code of the Republic of Kosovo.
The Court of Appeals found that the first degree court has correctly estimated that since there is a suspicion based that defendants have carried out the criminal work in question, there is legal basis for continuing the constitutional detention of the Penal Procedure Code, because with their finding in freedom, they can influence evidence or witnesses, or repeat criminal efforts.












