Analysts assess accessions before elections unfair

Even on the eve of the 6 October elections, as in past elections, different personalities have joined political subjects. Such moves, analysts liken them to football, which they say make them unsymishable to the subject but also to the political programme. Through offerings, people are being sold or borrowed, declared [...]
Contacters of political issues estimate that such approaches are not fair, as they occur in time of campaigning.
For politicologist Ramush Tahiri through accession, people are being sold or borrowed. For him, the reasons for political accession are different, and as a result, the result is primarily a mutually beneficial conglomeration.
And what seems bad at this job, according to Tahiri, is that politics is seen to be above everything.
According to him, it is much better to have more people out of politics than in politics.
And for those who pass from subject to subject, Tahiri considers that such movements are of no value.
Even political analyst Nundman Pacarizi says joining the election threshold is insincere.
However, he says that there are various situations of accession, where there are amendments to political beliefs.
And for those who have changed political subjects, Paris says they are political mercenaries aiming to enjoy the privileges of political forces.
And current connoisseur Rasim Alija made an interesting comparison to accession. The education of professors, economists, analysts and artists, according to him, resembles football.
He stresses that it remains to be seen how much it will help political subjects, as according to him, such movements have not rarely brought voter losses instead of new votes.
Otherwise, the election campaign will last 10 days, starting on September 25th. Early parliamentary elections will be held on October 6th.











