Kosovo's most eloquent Hoxha speaks of Darwin's Theory, Education in Mother tongue, homosexuals, women and Islamobine

This is an interview conducted by Periscope with Mr. Drilon Hoxha, who recently fell into the public opinion scene with his opposed stances with a large portion of the world's well-known combs in Kosovo.

Periscope:

1-You got public opinion attention as a hodge that accepted Darwin's theory. Are there many others who accept the theory in question?

Drilon Gashi:

For evolution, people are generally divided into two main groups:

The first group denies evolution as a whole and believes in the concept of special creation for each species. These are so-called creationists. The first creationists were Christians and claimed that the world was created in a period of six days, and one day it was twenty - four hours. According to them, the world is only a few thousand years old, and the god created forms of life on earth, without using the foretaste of life to do so. The creationists also refuse to accept literal science if it contradicts their understanding of the literal meaning of Genesis or another sacred book that they believe.

The second group recognizes the evolution of species and say that their origins were common, from which other existing species evolved, but they think the whole process happened by chance, by itself without cause. According to them, there is no reason to believe in a God who is leading this whole process and there is no need for intervention or guidance of a supernatural subject. Heritage, random change, and natural selection are enough to explain the complex structures of life. The laws of nature are enough to explain all physical phenomena, without the need to call a supernatural being. This evolution has been called Atheistic Evolution.

There are other positions. There are also those who say that God created creatures by evolution, except for the man who created them with a special creation. Zaglul Nexhari, Jusuf Kardavid, and Yassir Qadi, in the correct sense of some Koranic verses saying that man was created from clay. That thought too is baseless, and the facts of contemporary science contradict it.

The creationists do not have sufficient appreciation of the Bible or the Koran, so they compromise themselves with their baseless objections to evolution.

Even atheist evolutionists cannot have enough scientific appreciation for life and the world and compromise themselves when they are sold as anti-intellectual by denying metaphysics and logic through physics and natural science.

We think the truth lies in Evolution Guided From God or EV O THE BIBLE T EISTIC. This direction unites science with sound logic; it accepts scientific data that claims the evolution of species, and especially the organic genetics, but it comments on this process of sound logic; evolution does not happen by chance and has not selectively singled out <x0).

The Koran is not a biology book, and it is not clearly mentioned how the first humans developed, but it has commanded us to explore nature and see how life began: (Muhammad), travel through the land and see how He originated creation. Then God will bring about the next creation. It is true that God has power over all things” (Ankebut, 20). Taking a few verses correctly and concluding that the Koran opposes evolution is a crime. Rather, there are many signs in the Koran that promote the evolution of the cosmos and living species that we have mentioned in some of our writings.

Darwin was not the first to knock on the door of Evolution, but he actually developed it. In the West, the theory of evolution was mentioned before Darwin. We've all heard of Frenchman Jean-Bapist de Lamarck, who founded a very famous theory of species evolution.

Even in the east, Islamic scholars have signaled a thousand years ago. The following is a few:

- In his 1874 book, entitled “History of the conflict between religion and science”, John William Draper, a scientist and contemporary of Charles Darwin, criticised the Catholic Church for not recognising Muhammad's “ory about human evolution from lower forms, development in its present state over a long period of time.

- Ibn Khaldun in his book of sociologisty “Al Muqadimah” speaks of transforming species in an amazing way.

And also Al-Jashidh, the great scholar Mu'tazili, in his book eight volumes he wrote about animals (Kitab al-Hayavan), a thousand years ago mentioned the transformation and evolution of species in a way.

In the same century, Persian scholar Ibn Miskavahy wrote about human evolution in his books Tahdib and Favz al-jari.

In Turkey, important Muslim scholars and hosts tried to accept the theory of evolution in Islamic writings during the first decades of the Turkish Republic. Among them we can name Ahmed Hamdi Akekski and Süleyman Atte. Even Turkish Muslim thinker Erzurumlu Iebbim Hakki (in 1772) had an evolutionary approach before Darwin (1882), where, in his famous book Marifetname, he summed up his theory of evolution through a mystical approach.

Ismail Hakkı Izmirli wrote an article entitled “Filosofia of Ihvan Es-Saffa and Evolution Theory “. In this article, Izmirli was absolutely sure that Ihvanu Es-Saffa in the tenth century developed the theory long before Charles Darwin did. The only difference is that they called divine “hiri” what Darwin called the “natural selection”.

Many other Muslim scholars, such as f.v: Xhemaluddin Afgani, Muhamed Abduh, Rashid Rida, Huseyin Al-Jisri, etc.

-The most dominant contemporarys who have written books and held speeches on you to support evolution are also Nidall Kasum, Basil Al Tai, Amr Sheriff, Adnan Ibrahim, etc.

In general, what we need to know is that the facts of experimental science that our senses or sound logic have witnessed are also purely magical facts.
We need to give up signs of ignorance hanging over our heads and we need to be pretty modest in scientific data. To agree or disagree is the right of experts who study these things.
And do not follow what you do not know. Indeed, hearing, sight, and heart all of these [they will be questioned] are responsible] (Israel, 36).

Periscope: 

2-You have expressed the position that in the Koran forgiveness is also permitted in your mother tongue. Why do you think other combs oppose your opinion?

Drilon Gashi:

What I have mentioned concerns the category of those who do not understand Arabic and are unable to read the Koran in the original.

In fact, the master of the Hannephite doctrine [Abu Hanifa] 1,000 years ago has dared to open this theme, where, in the book “Al Mudi As-Sagyri” it literally says: “Transmeton Muhammad ( Ibn Hasen Sejban) of Jacob ( And this of Abu Hanaf, he is questioned about a man who opens the prayer, or says Allah's Book in Persian, or reads the Qur'an in the language of prayer, or slaughters the beast, and says Bismilah in the Arabic language - is it worth the effort?
Abu Hanif said: Yeah.
His two students, Abu Jusuf and Muhammad, have said: That's not allowed to him, but if you don't know Arabic, then he's also allowed by them”. (verily quote)
It's mentioned by Abu Hanaffe that he's back on that thought and has finally reconciled to the opinion of two of his students. As a result, if a person does not know Arabic, he will pray in another language, p.v. It says: Allah is the Greatest and then he sings the Koran with translation into Albanian, his prayer is in order in the opinion of the classic scholars of our hanefie school.

He who does not know how to read the Arabic Koran is commanded to remember God and to make mourning. The translation of the Koran into Persian or Albanian is a kind of goat, so where is the person allowed to recite it in prayer?

Whoever says, "The prayer is not accepted from this person in this form - he must bring a clear proof; otherwise his claim remains in vain.

And in your question, why do other combs object to your opinion?

It is only natural that the firehouses have numerous dyvergences, as do philosophers, psychologists, scientists, politicians, and so on, and this does not testify to the halting of the search for truth and the tracking of arguments, rather.

The causes of different opinions and dyvences are different because they distinguish doctrine, approach, professional preparation, meaning, purpose, and so forth. What is important is tolerance, being open - minded, respecting another opinion, and remaining brothers as we are commanded.

Periscope:

3-Do you believe Islam is discriminated against women and do you think that should change?

Drilon Gashi:

Islam has by no means discriminated against the female, but that is what Arabs and Albanians have done.

According to the Koran, the woman is the same as the man because they were made of the same origin and cell. It is simply their gender and their various duties toward each other and to society.

There is a difference between being equal to God; that women are appreciated and have authority in family and society, and that is gender equality in all specific areas of life. The latter is an example for women to make imams in collective prayer in front of men at the mosque, which is not preferred because then can the jammat concentrate on prayer or its beauty? This excuse for us in this case is preferable, and it does not represent gender discrimination ever.

Other example: We know that the woman usually gets married, gets her bride from her husband, hers, and goes to live in his house, and there's another share of her wealth. In the inheritance legislation, if the father was to share two handfuls of wealth with the girl as well as the boy, then the woman would be three, and the boy would be wronged because that poor man usually has to care for his family, and the woman doesn't owe him any more.

Other example: The testimony of the woman half the testimony of the man in court. That is yet another suspicion, when some evil-doers attack the Qur'an.

It's psychological and anatomical truth that the male generally dominates more rational aspects, while the woman has more emotional character. The husband is usually more complete in logical terms, while the emotional and emotional failing is more complete with her feelings than her husband, but more rationally impaired. For this reason, they should try to meet each other's shortcomings together.

Since the woman is dominated emotionally, she needs to have a helper, as the Koran mentions, in the case of evidence of serious crimes.

This doesn't suggest the female is half brainy, as some ignorant people have realized, absolutely. Man's inability to do one thing is not considered missing. For example, I may be a good accountant, but I don't know medicine. Someone else may be a good doctor, but ignorant in engineering. The serpent is protected by poison, and the animal is protected by slaughter. A husband cannot be born, nor can he breastfeed a child, and a woman usually cannot work in an ore.

By such diversity of life and nature, it results in a marvelous fulfillment.

The woman in order to become a witness to the court, she usually has to testify to a particular crime, and in this case her emotions can make her own and beat her brain, especially when she sees the color of blood for example, or the image of a criminal, or she can cover up fear or dread, things that could easily cause her absence of the crime in question, so she needs a helper from this point.

Someone might say: But there are times when a woman is rational than a man.

We say: Yes, but the legislative code usually takes into account most of the cases and under that it formulates the law.

That's for a woman who doesn't usually do evidence and doesn't work in a municipality. And the woman who's so excited about these things and field specialist, she can make an exception. And God knows better.

There are many doubts about the status of the woman in Islam, doubts that we can't all explain in a scripture like this.

Periscope:

Last 4 years, many different Kosovo hoes have attacked homosexuals. What is your position on this matter?

Drilon Gashi: 

The Koran prohibits homosexuality, which can be seen from the verses we speak of, such as f.v. Cover: Araf: 80,81, Shra: 165,166, Neml: 54-56, etc. Even so, the Koran does not order these people to be killed. And the legend which is attributed to the prophet, that if he commanded it, he would not stand as an evidence.

Homosexualism not only according to the Holy Book but also logically is a bad job, because it leads to the destruction of the offspring, and if the offspring are destroyed then that's the path leading up to mankind's far removal and the wisdom of the world's creation goes down. How can morale be viewed as ruining society?

In man, it is not instinct that determines and perceives good and bad, but it is the reason why they should prevail. We are not mere animals based solely on instinct. If the sex act of the same gender is in harmony with the demands of nature, then even the murders that animals commit to their young and cannibalism within the same species are compatible with their nature!

This is contrary to our custom, for it was not formerly known to our fathers and ancestors. If this is going down, why should we Albanians?

If anyone says that there are homosexuals who are scientists, we say that there are autisms who are extremely good at math, but on the other hand, as a consequence of disorders, they have the capacity to eat a pipsy without stopping and they're not aware of it, and that's why we send the special psychologist who handles it.

Other: If we allow homosexuality, why should we not even allow nuddo, animal marriage, or group marriage?

If homosexuality is sexual preference, then paedophilia is nothing but sexual preference. So does necrophilia, zoophilia, incest, etc. These scientific things too may not be harmful.

How can adoption of homosexuals be right when it forces a young child to have two fathers or two mothers? Will a child who grows up with two fathers without a mother and vice versa grow up without any psychiatric problems?

Hence, viewing it as a mere sexual preference is harmful to our society in many ways.

And if it is discovered in the near future that it is a psychological or physical disorder of the individual, then medical and psychological treatment should be treated, just as all other disorders are treated.

These things we need to study carefully. Not everything that the law permits, the Lord loves it, and it must be done. Public homes, alcohol, extramarital ties, guilt, the orphan's goods, and so on, but all these are detestable acts of the Great God. God is merciful and forgiving.

What we said about homosexuality should not be meant as an attack on them, absolutely, but it's just an opinion of me, because that's not what my morale wanted.

After all, they are humans and creatures of God. We hate, not men, but their evil deeds.

Periscope:

5-Do you think a part of Muslims in Kosovo suffer from Islamophobia?

Drilon Gashi: 

In Kosovo, as in any country around the world, there may be different seals. It is possible that one will have Islamofobi, another willniofobi, Shiitofobi, Sufimofobi, Sehirofobi, encnophobic, and Drilolophobia.

Sunitophobia has appeared to the state of Iran; an example in his capital, Tehran, we have not even a single starry mosque, despite the fact that there are about 20 synagogues, churches, and other temples of worship!
And it has spread especially among the eyes that some people do not eat the palm trees that come out of Iran; and finally it occurred to me to see how some people fear to hear the Qur'an from a boy, except because it is rain!
And this is also manifest, especially in the brothers of our frat...
Sehirefobia, too, is quite popular, especially in women.
Schencophobia is shown to some who do not recognize it; they are afraid of scientific theories such as the Evolution Theory, etc.
While Drilonophobia, this too has its size, here with the slogans “Khini be careful of the hodge Drilon Gashi! The” of the time misusing my picture with the big X letter, and sometimes blocking me from their pages, forums, and meclis.

Even so, in general our Albanian people do not think they have Islamophobia, because Islam has been its religion for decades. What they fear most are some radical interpretations of Islam that have entered our country after the recent war of Kosovo and here. Add to that the latest events in the Islamic world that have made it their own as well.

Periscope:

6- Is Kosovo still endangered by extreme religious currents?

Drillon Gsahi:

Japan was hit by nuclear bombs and lifted up after two decades, while we Muslims, particularly Arabs and Albanians, were hit by the bombings of sectarian and group extremism and were not left to date. Thus, real experiments have shown that sectarian bombs and sectarian extremism are the deadliest species of bombs.

Extremism leads to terrorism, and mankind has recently witnessed several terrorist attacks in several countries of the civilized world. Terrorism has no religion, but it may have a doctrine, a sect, an ideology, and a master. In fact, these men who make such attacks are dangerous criminals, are enemies of peace, enemies of life, enemies of mankind, of art, and enemies of civilization. They are the deadly cancer of societies that must be destroyed as soon as possible.

Though I SIS has fallen, its roots continue to exist to this day.

Is Kosovo endangered by such extreme currents? I think so, and this spirit of extremism is living every day. In my address alone, the time of the end has been directed over a hundred insults, insults and threats from most ways, just because I think differently than what they believe. Is that not extremism?

Hundreds of books translated by extremist authors have been distributed, and sometimes even without seed authors, books that, according to statistics and field specialists, are considered the dough and the main fuel of ISIS. The worst part is that some of these books have been translated and revised by the workers of the Islamic Community of Kosovo!

The other key fault of all of this is poor dogmatic religious legalization that has settled in the simple mass. Many combs in their writings and You Tube are using the language of hatred and division over other doctrines, which serves neither unity nor our nation. They did the same in Syria and Iraq until this led to the destruction of those countries. We don't want the same thing spreading to our country.

Extreme imported “Islams” have been born as a result of the amulity and extinction of critical thought within the prayers of Muslims.

The healing from these extremes comes by giving life and dynamism to critical thinking. Critical and free thinking kills extremists, and we are trying to do this a long time. We have to mobilise all of us and fight every negative phenomenon that spreads in society, because if we don't treat it with food, it's like a virus, one day it destroys society.

God protects our country and our people from harm. Amen.