Special interviewed: Also questioned in The Hague of LDK testimony

Nitemanaj confirmed he was invited as a witness.

“After the first phone contact came later invitations. On the 13th, I traveled to The Hague. On 14 I was interviewed by the Special Court for two days, even on May 15th. As an invitation, it wasn't specified how I was invited, but when I went, I realized that I was invited as a witness to”, said Nexmanaj, former member of the Brigade 122”Ymer Krasniqi” in Malisheva.

Tuaj has added that she has been asked mainly about developments that took place during the war, exactly for the July 1998 period.

“have been interested in the command line. In July 1998 it was the war of Rahovec, and the main theme was about those events. Even though it had nothing to do with Malisheva, investigators have been asking about the fate of missing Serbs. But, this invitation has come because a family had come from Rahoveci to Malisheve”, he said. “She was a Serb family, a 23-year-old mother and a two-year-old child, and her mother-in-law came to KLA headquarters”.

Pummanaj says their contact with this Serb family at the time was very correct, even feeding them, and after that took over the Red Cross.

"Absolutely," they were not tortured and that fact makes me proud. They have witnessed at The Hague how they are treated in Malisheva. When they came to headquarters we were introduced by names so they would feel cheaper and not afraid. Of course, these are in our favor, that they have been correct. Of course we asked about her husband's fate, but they don't know where she had gone. We don't know if he was killed by KLA soldiers or not”, Tmanaj said.

According to him, this is one of the elements that confirms the purity of the KLA.

On the other hand, he has indicated that there was also an LDK testimony in The Hague.

I've experienced many materials that have emerged there, too, is that deposited by the LDK branch in Malisheva, however, they are political ire after the war. Although pressure has been put on my interview in The Hague, I am one of the few I have been transparent since my invitation there. KLA members have nothing to hide. This is the fourth court to pass these processes, yet it is a political process that is damaging us”, he said.

He has confirmed that this LDK testimony had been deposited in 2000, which said the KLA had ordered the closure of LDK activities, but according to Takmanaj was required only to release the premises.

It has not been a testimony against me, but against the people of the KLA in general. There could be mistakes back then, but that's a fact. It was deposited in 99 or 2000. It was more like you ordered me to shut down. We must have needed a lot of space. The most recent period has been deposited due to political rivalry. Of course, it is not easy when you see a testimony from a party that most have been from KLA soldiers. This is unacceptable. Whether to sign the subject with the physical document is required in this document to close the premises instead of closing the activity. It's never their activity. In addition to explaining, there has been a demand that was required to release”, he said.