The prosecution seeks maximum prison sentence against accused in the murder of Donjeta Pajazitaj

The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pec has asked the Constitutional Court in Pec to sentence defendant Naser Pajazitaj, who is charged with killing his cousin, Donjeta Pajaziaj, to maximum prison.

Such a proposal has been given by prosecutor Valbona Dishaj-Hajoya at Monday's hearing, where the retrial ended in this case. Naser Pajasitaj is charged with being brutally deprived of life now in the mountains of the Decani Community of Strellcit, by means of life.

But the Court of Appeals has later turned the subject into retrial. At Monday's session, among other things, the prosecutor said the first information the family now felt about their daughter's disappearance had received from now accused Naser Pajaziaj.

According to her, it has been generally proven that the accused Pajazitaj had committed the now deceased murder by exploiting the victim's confidence and silence, and the same was found on the Stralci Mountains by two random passersby.

The prosecutor said the accused had given some disinformations to the now deceased family, as if he had seen it in several countries, but this move by the accused, according to her, was meant to avoid finding the victim's body.

Among other things, she added that the fact that the accused on the critical day had not been at the burial of a fellow villager had been confirmed through the security cameras. Meanwhile, the defendant's defender, lawyer Guzim Kolqaku, demanded that his defender, Naser Pajazitaj, be released from the indictment in absence of evidence. Kolqaku said his defence had not now received the car's deceased, according to him, confirmed by the report of the prosecution's car examination conducted in Ankara, Turkey.

According to lawyer Kolqak at the scene, no shelling of the weapon had been found, while no samples of Donjett Pajazitaj hair were found in the defendant's car.

And Naser Pajaziaj, in his final word, said he swore he had nothing to do with the murder of Donjeta Pajaziaj and that he knew nothing of her murder. After specifying the indictment by the prosecution, where it is removed from the unrecognised weapon allegedly used for the murder, the accused pleaded guilty to the criminal act of gunkeeping and a few fish found in his home.

Otherwise, prior to giving the final word, material evidence has been read and video-incisions are broadcast showing the defendant Naser Pajasitaj's car on the critical day near the House of Yussa, for which the prosecution claims the accused had received Donjet Pajaziaj.

Also watched was the video recording where the accused at a family firearms at a family party. The accused Naser Pajazitaj used his right, legal as in the previous court review.

The announcement of the court will be made at 1500. Otherwise, the Constitutional Court in Pec, in March of this year, accused Naser Pajasitaj had cleared him of charges of killing Donjeta Pajasitaj, while convicted him of the illegal weapons criminal conduct for which Pajasitaj had been sentenced to a unique sentence of two years and four months in prison.

According to this act, it had not been proven that the accused had committed the murder of Donjeta Pajazitaj, also his cousin. However, in October of this year, after the complaint that the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pec had exercised against this act, the second - degree court has decided to turn the case into retrial.

According to the interpretation of the Appeals Court, provided by “Justice Vow statement” points out that the first degree court, has failed to establish the actual situation correctly and in full, because according to Apel, there is a contradiction in the statement of the Arjet Ukaj witnesses, the daughter of the accused between her statement and parent Naserjasitaj, who has declared that the day the death of the late Donjet occurred, has come up with his daughter and then went to the funeral, but during the hearing of the same prosecutor, the same day Donkaj disappeared from home, but I have changed the same pressure from the family members of the statement.

Similarly, according to Apel, the first degree court must manage the evidence and verify the indictee's whereabouts on the critical day and that the late Donjat Pajasitaj was in the now accused's car, because with the report of investigators Albrim Mujaj and Veton Kelmendi, it has been estimated that a witness who wanted to remain anonymous had declared that the critical day was observed by Naser Paziaj, with the car <x0Gand Shiroka<1>, right near the house of Hakja Hakjaj, who was the most stopped, and 13:40, and anyone who had just suspected that Donja did.

According to Appeal, from this it turns out that such confirmation of the actual situation has been issued in substantial violation of criminal procedure provisions, from Article 384 par.1 subpar.1.12. According to the Constitutional Prosecutor's Act in Pec, founded on June 8, 2017, Naser Pajasitaj was charged with claiming that on November 9th 2015, around 14:30 in the Sterlci Mountains of the Decani municipality, with weapons, he was brutally deprived of life to the late Dogjet Pajaziaj.

While the deceased has been going to work on foot, there goes the defendant with his car, takes the deceased, takes him to the high mountain, where he originally cuts out of his life by shooting twice in her head, and then losing the same track, covers him with some trees and leaves the scene. The body of the deceased is in over a month.

With that, Pajasitaj was charged with committing the criminal offence of “serious murder” by Article 179 par 1 points 1.4 and 1.12 of KPRK. The same indictment was charged with the criminal offence of “ownership, nonauthorized possession of weapons” by Article 374 par 1 of KPRK, or even an automatic weapon, hunting rifle, 12 rounds, and a type <x4 gun. > AK 47”.