LDK's Vetevendosje that refused participation in dialogue now drafts common points for it

Media reported yesterday that Vetevendosje Chairman Albin Kurti visited the LDK's Isa Mustafa, with whom they discussed recent developments in the country. Today, the two leaders of opposition parties issued a joint media communique through which they showed details from the meeting. Lower communique: Communication from the chairman's meeting [...]
Today, the two leaders of opposition parties issued a joint media communique through which they showed details from the meeting.
Lower communique:
Communication from the Democratic League of Kosovo meeting, Mr. Isa Mustafa and Speaker of Movement V SUNDAY! Albin Kurti
In line with their policies and positions, two opposition parties, the Democratic League of Kosovo and the V Movement ENVIDENCE! will be committed to the independent state of Kosovo, as the parliamentary republic with territorial and institutional integrity, with state sovereignty and incompatible borders.
Given the political crisis due to irresponsible, unregistered and non-transparent initiatives of the president of Kosovo, the two leaders of opposition parties, who are also the two largest parties in the Republic of Kosovo, estimate that:
1. The negotiation of any final agreement with Serbia must be made with a parliamentary formula guaranteeing wide political unity. The Kosovo Assembly is the only institution that exercises the authority to determine what it can and cannot negotiate, through transparent decision-making and at least a qualified majority of 2/3. Dialogue must be developed by a government that has political legislation and represents the parliamentary majority. The platform with purposes and principles should also be legitimate through a qualified 2/3 majority of the Parliament's deputies.
It was estimated that 33 agreements reached so far must be addressed, respectively, their implementation, implementation and influence.
The president of the Republic must behave in harmony with the Constitution, he enjoys no authority to negotiate interstate aspects with Serbia, for the fact that they affect the essence of constitutional democracy principles in Kosovo.
2. Negotiating any issue that is the constitutional root and element of the state of Kosovo, such as territory, constitutional institutions, population, natural resources, is unacceptable and they cannot become the subject of negotiating with Serbia. Such determination does Kosovo respect based on the international law principle on which it declared independence in 2008, and which also reflects the position of key countries that have recognised Kosovo's independence. Any escape from such a foundation is denial of the road to statehood of the Republic of Kosovo, based on NATO's humanitarian international intervention, the role of peaceful resistance and the liberation fight for Kosovo freedom, the democratic values the people of Kosovo defend, as well as the SEND opinion that recognises legality such a path of liberalising the standards of international law.
3. An agreement with Serbia cannot be seen in any prism other than that of the recognition Kosovo has significantly enjoyed in its veto of Serbia's EU membership, which is clearly defined in Chapter 35 and the European Commission's Enlargement Strategy. Serbia cannot join the EU without reaching an agreement with Kosovo. Therefore, this is the only thing Kosovo can give Serbia in exchange for its recognition of the independent state of Kosovo, the acceptance of the principle of non-intervention in Kosovo's internal affairs, recognition of Kosovo's legal ability to join the UN, and addressing damage and war losses and the principle of reciprocity for good neighbourly relations.
4. Kosovo will have full co-ordination and gratitude for the position of the United States, Germany, France, Great Britain and Italy. Kosovo will eternally recognise the contribution of these states and their representatives and missions to the statehood in Kosovo, and will seek help from the same ones to strengthen Kosovo's independence and state in international law. It was estimated that calling an international conference would be unnecessary and unacceptable, since it would pave the way for the intervention of Russia and China in a process of independence, which has been closed in 2008 and cannot return to any elements of its citizenship.
5. Kosovo is an independent state and its citizenship cannot be renegotiated to any of its components. Kosovo will remain such a state in international law with or without Serbia's recognition. No one can re-evaluate the Kosovo state's attribute as the product of resistance and the people's struggle for freedom, NATO intervention and the strict consensus of Western democracies for such a thing.












