Limaj-VVV therefrom: How do you plan to come to Government when protecting illegal votes?

Social Democrat Initiative head Fatmir Limaj at RTK tonight has said Vetevendosje changed statements about Serbian's upcoming vote, only to receive three more mandates from his party, Periscopi broadcasts. There are three party communiqués seeking rejection. Today they say otherwise. Which to take as [...]
There are three party communiqués seeking rejection. Today they say otherwise. Which takes me as good. If you were to file a shopping panel a week ago you had an Identical attitude with the one who made the P decision. ZAP. We're talking by law. We heard them say they're illegal. What a confident statement, what is truth, Limaj asked.
Limaj has called Vetevendosje hypocrites, asking how he can be trusted a government such as to receive mandates with illegal votes.
You don't have to deal with the country like this, and you're shopping. You can think wrong, professional. Doesn't make a CEC member for a week change his mind. The same decision you said three days ago. It doesn't work. What have you done today? Why an independent institution? You saw it through smuggled votes winning three deputies. It's not correct a party that's going to run the state, saying shopping, for something you said yesterday is legal. Today their action shows hypocrisy and the removal of masks
What do you mean, having three deputies more with unfair votes? What do you need them for? How do you accept a party? What a message you're taking to the government. Protecting illegal votes/ P ERISCOPI/












