Reagon Ymer: Vuciqi's Defiling Through Kosovo Aims to Demarket Its Land

PSD MP Visar Ymeri, in a long Facebook post, has written about Serbian President Aleksandar Vuciq's visit to Kosovo. Vuciqi's “Gazimestan” and (no) Thaci's responsibility has titled his reaction, former head of Vetevendosje. “In 1989, Serbia's powerful leader, Milosevic had chosen Gazimestan to appear as the protector of [...]
Vuciqi's “Gazimestan” and (no) Thaci's responsibility has titled his reaction, former head of Vetevendosje.
In 1989, Serbia's powerful leader, Milosevic had chosen Gazimestan to appear as the protector of Kosovo Serbs. In 2018, Serbia's powerful leader, Vuciqi chose Kosovo's north to appear as the protector of Kosovo Serbs. The victimisation for implementation of plans on behalf of re-defining relations between Kosovo and Serbia, between Albanians and Serbs. New circumstances, same goal, different methods.
Milosevic's Gazimestan was the entry into a new chapter, even by combat means. The result is”, Umer said.
According to him, Vucinqi's north of Kosovo is aimed at entering a new chapter, with peaceful means, in agreement with Hashim Thaci.
The resolution is not known”, he said.
Vuciqi's “Defiling through Kosovo's territory, the countries he visited, was intended to demarcate his alternative as the wolf does. Even institutional leaders of the country helped with their inaction. So Vicchiki '%bé to visit the north of Weiman but not the other parts. If we don't have a problem with Vuciki's visit, then we shouldn't be prevented from visiting any part of Kosovo from him. If we have a problem with this visit, then it stands in our way wherever he's gone”, Umer said.
According to him, Hashim Thaci, who is ignoring the Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo, has more than ever the political and historical responsibility to recognise and inform the institutions and citizens of the Republic of Kosovo of his project for agreement with Vucinqi.
The necessary “peace between Kosovo and Serbia, Albanians and Serbs, cannot be built with nontransparent processes and with meetings closed by the eyes of the public”.












