American magazine for the partition of Kosovo: Causes in Disaster

Named “magine Foreign Policy” has recently written an article opposing the idea of partitioning Kosovo and exchanging territories with Serbia, Gazeta Express notes.

University professor, author of this writing Michael Rossi, has said that a possible exchange of territories between Kosovo and Serbia could restore the Balkan bloodshed that occurred in the 1990s.

The article also speaks of a population transfer, which it says will not bring peace if that happens.

“Dating is a bad and very dangerous option, and this idea has long been officially rejected by all sides, for numerous reasons”, writes FP.

Any call for redefinition of borders and exchange of territory would almost certainly deteriorate into the type of violence and chaotic exchanges of the population that ravaged the region in the 1990s. It would be a commitment to the leadership to invite such wars back to European soil”, the known warehouse writes.

Foreign Policy It says that recently, partition would destroy years of work by the United States and the main powers of Western Europe that have given Kosovo's carefully drafted image of a multiethnic society, as well as efforts to convince Serbian and Albanian communities to live together.

The internationally supported agreements between Belgrade and Pristina for the establishment of autonomy authorisations for Kosovo Serbs would be burned”.

“The threat that brings border correction can open the Pandora box in the region, and that would encourage Serbs in Bosnia and Albanians in Macedonia to seek similar arrangements of territorial secession and joining their ethnic relatives”, the Express broadcasts.

If that happened, Foreign Policy says the international community would be forced to intervene in the Balkans to stop a new ethnonationalist land.