a minute agoThere are sanctions for prosecutors who fail charges
Periskopi(8 years ago)
(8 years ago)In cases where a prosecutor does not constantly pass the courses to the courts for procedural errors or intentional errors, they feel that the prosecutor must be relieved of his duty after the evaluation. Many high profile charges have ended with a free trial by courts in the absence of evidence, including the case of the former sector [...]
In cases where a prosecutor does not constantly pass the courses to the courts for procedural errors or intentional errors, they feel that the prosecutor must be relieved of his duty after the evaluation.
Many high profile charges have ended with a court-free trial in the absence of evidence, including the case of former Pristina University sector Enver Hasani, former head of the Appeals Court Sali McLat, of former Health Ministry Permanent Secretary Ilir Tollaj, and many other cases.
This has prompted the response of civil society and the connoisseurs of justice cases, who claim that there should be a revision of the error in the establishment of groundless charges or the lack of courage for fighting high-level corruption.
State Prosecutor's officials claim there have been cases where prosecutors have been forced to go to training, as their performance has been minimally assessed by the Commission for Performation.
The prosecutor's performance assessment issue, according to them, is adjusted to Rule No. 122015, for the Prosecutors' performance assessment, which defines criteria and sources of information to realise the performance assessment on the part of the Commission for Prosecutors' Performance assessment.
