33 minutes agoThe Constitution refutes the Supreme decision in the Drenica case
Periskopi(8 years ago)
(8 years ago)The Constitutional Court has turned it into a re-evaluation of the Drenica Supreme Court. “In accordance with rule 74 (1) of the working order, the Supreme Court PML Act. No. July 19th 2017, 322/2016, is declared invalid and the case is returned to the Supreme Court for reevaluating”, they reportedly broadcast Koha.net. Predators of demand [...]
“In accordance with rule 74 (1) of the working order, the Supreme Court PML Act. No. July 19th 2017, 322/2016, is declared invalid and the case is returned to the Supreme Court for reevaluating”, they reportedly broadcast Koha.net.
The petitioners are Isni Thaci, Zecir Demak, Fadil Demaku, Nexhat Demaku, and Jahir Demaku.
These were found guilty by the Constitutional Court in Mitrovica (P58/14) for conducting criminal acts sanctioned with Article 152 [War crimes in grave violation of Article 3 Common with the Geneva Conventions] in connection with Article 31 [Coordination] of the Republic of Kosovo Penal Code (KPRK).
The Supreme Court argued its ruling regarding the pre-missors' claims of violations of the judges' appointment to the courts, stressing that, based on EULEX Guidance, the chairman of EULEX judges has complete freedom to appoint judges to college, despite any particular rule contained in education
