2 minutes agoMollyqa: These are the three major differences between VV) and PSD)
Periskopi(8 years ago)
(8 years ago)According to Dardan Moliqaj, now the Social Democrat Party deputy -- once part of Vetevendosje -- has some differences between these two parties. He has said there are three major differences between Vetevendosje and the group, which recently emerged in the PSD. According to him, the first distinction was social democracy, the second [...]
He has said there are three major differences between Vetevendosje and the group, which recently emerged in the PSD.
According to him, the first distinction was social democracy, the second was approach and approach to politics, as well as the principle of how Kosovo's development is seen.
Moliqaj has said that the Social Democrat Party has more opinions on the issue of joining Albania, and this party has called for changing the constitution's provisions for the right to referendum and the right to citizens' self-rule. He has stated that the PSD does not want confrontations among nations, but wants the <x0 state to be citizens and not have organisations on ethnic or historical grounds”.
“In the party we are there are people who think that Kosovo's union with Albania is right, needed and that brings development, as well as there are people who say the union is not necessary, it is not necessary. I'm in the first place because I believe this case is important because of certain dimensions. Our commonity is the civic state, the Socialocracy, the state's right to refer to and self-rule”, Moliqaj said in interactive.
He also talked about the party name.
According to Moliqaj, the Social Democrat programme of MPs who left Vetevendosje should be linked to a party of such name, and this party already existed on the political scene.
All of us who are part of the PSD have long discussed the principles that we can continue in politics. Based on what we've made public, we've made it clear that it's the left direction. It was the option to be part of the PSD, which had the name of exactly what we were. It was all because of the name because we were designated for social democrat orientation. We estimated it was best to be part of a party that exists. There's a lot of creativity and a chance to create a party. It takes 500 signatures that support the initiative and then procedural issues that we didn't lack. It had nothing to do with the fatigue of people because people get involved in politics, but it was our determination to be social Democrats in principle and values, and we wanted to make our program directly by the name, which was the Social Democrat Party. If this party hadn't existed, I can say with conviction, we would have done it in the Social Democrat Party”, he said.
