Prosecutor lifts organised crime in case targeted for visa liberalisation

In the criminal case against the eight charged with tax evasion, the Special Prosecutor of the case, Faik Halili, has renounced organised criminal acts.

The case, which is being tried at the Constitutional Court in Pristina, is one of the 39 cases targeted as a condition for visa liberalisation.

The special prosecutor, Faik Halili, indicated that after analyzing the indictment that has been prosecuted in previous reviews, he has come to the conclusion to remove the criminal work of organised crime, remaining in whole close to other criminal acts, such as avoiding tax and misuse of authorisations in the economy.

After reviewing again the material collected during the investigation, but, in particular, following the analysis of all the evidence and evidence that have been collected even during the many major reviews that have been held on this case, have all the expertise again, whatever is engaged by experts from P The SRK, but the ones submitted by the other parties, as well as the processes of key review hearings held earlier and after comprehensive analysis and consultations with my colleagues and with the laws in power and commentaries, have come to the conclusion that the key elements for organised crime were not completed”, prosecutor Halili said.

He added that the Special Prosecutor has not been able to prove that a well-organised structure exists as required on the basis of legal provisions for organised crime.

We couldn't prove that it really was a leading leader who by his actions would make up all elements of organised crime, so from what I'm saying, we have a legal obligation that at any time until the end of the final word to analyze all the circumstances and trials, so we have come to the conclusion that he should give up on organised crime”, he added.

After the prosecutor's speech, the representative of the damaged party took turns, which in this case is ATK. Shpend Plana said that the property-law requirement ATK is asking for from the accused has changed, increasing, reducing, even forgiving some of the accused.

Furthermore, Plana announced that ATK is seeking from accused Blerim Sinani the sum of 274,341.63 euros, from Skender Sinani 50,260.09 euros, from Isa Durguti 385,652.18 euros, from Samir Sinan 12,396.67, from Sabit Sogoeva 5,931.98 euros, and to Ramadan Sogovea 18.166.01.

Meanwhile, whose founder legal subject is accused Enver Hasani made it known that he has benefited from pardoning public debts from ATK, thus being pardoned the 106,302,000-euro debt, subsequently in relation to this accused, they had no property-law requests.

The same has benefited from the pardoning of the debt, another accused Mentor Emini, worth 16,263.88 euros.

After his speech, the reaction came from accused Isa Durgut of increasing the amount ATK demands from him, but Judge Hamdi Ibrahimi told him that the Court at this stage does not explain how high it is.

After the amended indictment, all the accused were acquitted again.

The procedure was to continue with the opening word, but lawyer Hedije Ademi who replaced it in the final part of the session attorney Emrush Kastrati demanded that the court review be delayed because it is not prepared.

The next session was scheduled for May.

In this trial are Blerim and Skender Sinani, Sabit and Ramadan Sogojevo, Mentor Emini, Isa Drgüt, Samir Sinanaj and Enver Hasani.

Part of this judicial process was accused Fatmir Sinani, but procedures have been isolated against him.

According to the indictment, Blerim, Skender and Fatmir Sinani, Isa Drguti, Samir Sinanaj, Sabi's Ramadan Sogojevo, Enver Hasani and Mentor Emini, operating as a group organised in the 2010-2014 era, in order to bring themselves direct financial enrichment, have registered their businesses, some of them extinguishers.

The indictment explains that to avoid paying the accused's taxes, he has issued extinguishing bills and has enabled other businesses to avoid taxes.

Based on the indictment, some of the businesses who have been issued the extinguishable bills from the accused in question are: “Acesi” S. P.K, “Lesa” S. P.K, and NTP “Besa” owned by accused Blerim Sinan, NTP. “Weekend” and “Val-2” whose owner is Skender Sinan, “Conto-Web” owned by accused Isa Durguti, “O and M” owned by accused Mentor Emini, “Bana” owned by Enver Hasani and many other companies. /Cashho. com/