6 minutes agoCharged in murder at '%Ban Vivant) contests the exhibition conducted in Albania
Periskopi(8 years ago)
(8 years ago)Niteman Uka, a security worker, had been killed at the workplace until he allowed Masar Grdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi to sit down to drink coffee at the locale located in the capital's most frequented area. The murder occurred on October 13, 2014, and the trial for the two accused is still continuing. His family [...]
Niteman Uka, a security worker, had been killed at the workplace until he allowed Masar Grdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi to sit down to drink coffee at the locale located in the capital's most frequented area. The murder occurred on October 13, 2014, and the trial for the two accused is still continuing. The accused's family, Massar Gerdovci, has today presented an expertise of the case prepared in Albania, which has also been rejected by the prosecution by the lawyer of accused Sheriff Krasniqi
Niteman Uka was a local security worker named “Ban Vivant” in downtown Pristina, who was killed because of a conflict that resulted from a person's failure to enter the club, writes the Express.
The local security worker “Ban Vivant” had not allowed Masar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi to enter the bar. This had initially led to the clash and then to the murder of Beftman Uka.
Gerdovci and Krasniqi are charged by the State Prosecutor for the murder that took place on the “Rexep Luci” on 13 October 2014.
At today's session, testimony was heard by ballistics expert Topalli standing and an expertise conducted by Albanian experts engaged by the Gerdovci family.
Attending Tuesday's session was Fitim Uka, a family member of the victim.
But before hearing his testimony begins, Judge Susan Cerkini indicated that on Monday evening, the lawyer of accused Gerdovci had handed him an expertise carried out by experts, citizens of Albania, at the request of Massar Gerdovci's family.
However, Kosovo ballistics expert, Topalli, said in his report it has found that in the outside of the bar, two injuries caused by firearms have been identified.
For these two bullets fired on the bar wall, Gerdovci's defender asked the expert to explain why no shelling or shells were found at the scene, but only injuries were found on the wall.
The expert, responding to the defence attorney, said that only one shell of the gun was found at the scene, while two wounds, which according to the expert, have been found, but thus far it has not been found.
The report finds the shooting came from outside the bar. I can only point out the shooter's position...”, he said.
On the basis of the wounds that betaman Uka received, the distance between the shooters and the deceased was determined to be less than three feet [1 m], or three feet [1 m], while in terms of the victim's wounds, the expert said he cannot respond because it is not his competence.
“During the reconstruction of the site we have seen only external damage to the locale. If these shells were not extracted from the local techniques of the event, those missiles could certainly still be there”, the ballistics expert said.
In presenting the act of expertise from Albania that took place at the request of the accused's family, Sheriff Krasniqi's defence, lawyer Haxhi Milaku and the State Prosecutor rejected this expertise.
Both sides demanded that this expertise not be administered as evidence.
The defendant's lawyer, Sheriff Krasniqi, asked the court to give time to analyse the new expertise, though initially opposed it.
Gerdovci's defence attorney, however, said that if the court approves the family's proposal for Albania's expertise to be administered as evidence, then it requires the court to invite experts who compiled the expertise to give their testimony and necessary clarifications.
Even this request was rejected by the prosecutor, representative by the State Prosecutor. The same was done by the protection side of Sheriff Krasniqi, who is one of the two accused.
“From the report of Forenzice, the team from Albania, which is based on the country's reforming process of events and other reports during other phases of procedure, would be counterproductive to management of this test in the sense of a long and efficient and successful process of”, lawyer Milaku said.
This expertise, even, does not have the stamp of the competent body, so it does not meet the essential preconditions of an expert”, he said.
After that, the Grbovci family representative said little about lawyer Millaku's comments, but had a few words for the prosecutor.
The “is painful when the prosecution opposes expertise without giving any clarification, just as colleague Milaku” explained, Massar Grbovci's lawyer said.
The prosecution accuses Massar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi that in co-chairs they killed Nakman Uka, who was at the time the guard of the local “Bon Vivant” located in downtown Pristina.
Under the law in effect, if the two indictees are found guilty, they risk being sentenced to between 5 and 40 years in prison, while depending on the estimates of circumstances to life imprisonment. /Express Journal/
