Murder in a Pristina bar, indictees blame each other

The two accused of the murder case at “Ban Vivant” in Pristina, Massar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi, through their defenders, have blamed each other for the event that had occurred on October 13th 2014, where the guard of the bar, N where Uka was left dead. On Thursday at the Foundation Court in Pristina, it is [...]
On Thursday at the Constitutional Court in Pristina, final words have been given in this case, where Krasniqi's Gerdovci is accused that in co-ordination they had been deprived of life, now the late Unakman Uka, reports the “Bet on Justice”.
The defender of accused Masar Gerdovci, lawyer Naim Rudari, in the final address stated that there is no evidence that his defender had deprived the late Uka of life, but according to evidence and statements, such an act, as he said was undertaken by Sheriff Krasniqi.
But this has been opposed by the defender of the accused Krasniqi, lawyer Haxhi Milaku, who claimed his defender is completely innocent, because he has not had physical access to the weapon, and that the weapon has been Massar Gerdovci's, with which he claims, and has now deprived the late Uka of life.
While prosecutor Ferdane Sylejmani stated that during this review, it has been fully proved, and convincing that accused Masar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi have committed the criminal work of serious murder, and each separately, the criminal act of illegal weapons.
According to prosecutor Sylejmani, those actions were taken at the time when the same could be avoided and, according to her, deliberately and deliberately deprived of life of the deceased Uka.
Sylejmani highlighted psychiatric expertise, which had proved to be the defendant Gerdovci, has been able psychologically to understand the importance of his actions.
I consider that this case has been established in a comprehensive way, that the criminal act is done deliberately, and deliberately, so I remain close to the indictment, and I propose that the court punish the same as was pre-lawed”, Sylejmani added.
According to her, the accused have not been threatened, or finished, the same have been mentally able to understand the importance of their actions, and that their actions have been taken by direct action.
Sylejmani, stated that the the the thesis of the indictment was confirmed during this trial, through evidence presented during the procedure, such as testimony from witnesses, ballistic experts, psychiatric experts, and other evidence which proves, beyond the doubt that the same are the perpetrators of these crimes.
The prosecutor, he proposed to the court that the same others plead guilty and punish them with capital punishment.
By the prosecutor's final address, Sylejmani was hired by the representative of the damaged party, lawyer Armend Krasniqi.
Krasniqi stated that during this procedure, it has been confirmed that the accused have now deprived of life of the deceased, Nundman Uka, who, in his view, had also contributed to the death of his father, who had changed his life a month after the murder of his son.
According to the representative, the deceased was the only family holder, and according to Krasniqi, the family will apply for compensation of material damage and not material.
He proposed to the court that the accused be convicted and condemned by law.
The defender of accused Gerdovci, lawyer Naim Rudari, in his final address stated that there is great uncertainty in the prosecution's device, though the prosecutor in her final address, according to him, claimed it remained close to the indictment, it is unclear.
According to him, in the indictment it has been determined that his defense “fired a gun, but his weapon hasn't fired”, the quality that, according to Rudri, is unclear.
According to Rudar, there is also a dilemma about naming the criminal act” the grave murder”, because according to him, the grave murder is when “is determined by the life of the person, and puts at risk the life of others” or “I expect from life the other official person, or during the exercise of official duty”.
According to him, the official “is the person who exercises tasks according to authorisations stemming from law”, but Rudari stated that no contract has been offered during this procedure with which the deceased's duties in that cafe are described.
According to Rudar, there has been no correct definition of legal, criminal, which says “co-ordination”, because according to him, co-ordination is meant by the company of co-ordinated and planned actions.
However, the accused have not been hired and co-ordinated for anything other than drinking coffee”, the protector Rudari added.
According to defender Rudari, this voice was preceded by cafe managers “Ban Vivant”, placing his doubts that the same were coordinating their statements so that other irregularities that occurred on the critical day are not highlighted.
The defender of the accused, Masar Gerdovci, casts his doubts on witnesses who, according to him, have manipulated with the evidence, even leaving open the option of any criminal offence for false testimony, that after the same had issued controversial statements.
Rudari claimed that his protector has personality disorders, a disorder that is transmitted with unacceptable behavior for society, low tolerance, and aggression, but that according to psychiatric expert, this disorder does not prevent the same person from passing judgment.
“We request the court to analyse all material evidence, and declaration, and I propose that my protector be found guilty of the illegal armed work for which he has pleaded guilty, as he is set free for the criminal work serious murder, because it has not proved Gerdovci to have taken deliberate action of life”, Rudari said.
At this session, the defender of the accused, Sheriff Krasniqi, lawyer Haxhi Milaku, who declared there is uncertainty about describing individual actions in the indictment.
“In the individual aspect of the description of the event, of the actions, the prosecutor missed”, Milaku said, saying there are dilemmas regarding the individual actions of the accused.
According to Milak, the time interval from the first two matches and the other two, is so small that in 10 seconds, according to him, it is impossible for the weapon to switch from Gerdvoci to Krasniqi.
He has said that Sheriff Krasniqi, is completely innocent, because the same has not had physical access to weapons, proposing to the court to take upon himself a free trial.
According to Milak, Gerdovci was provoked, “did not have a reservation” and, according to him, the same was violated by pride, and has immediately taken actions that have brought the consequences that are today, alluding that after the fight, Gerdovci had reacted and deprived the life of the late Uka.
“I'm giving the gun to the owner who's putting it on the ground, and you see the Sheriff taking it right away to”, that's not possible”, Millaku said.
At this brief session, the accused Sheriff Krasniqi was also declared. Before God and before the slave I am clean and have made no contribution to the murder of the late”, Krasniqi added.
According to Judge Susan Qerkey's announcement, the court's announcement will be postponed, because one of the jurors will be on an official trip from November 5th to 10th.
The announcement of the act is expected to take place on November 12th by 2: 00 p.m.
According to the indictment filed on July 7th 2015, Massar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi are charged with committing criminal work, serious murder and illegal weapons.
According to the prosecution, on October 13, 2014, Massar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi have gone to the “Bon Vivant”, which is located on the “Rexhep Luci” route in Pristina.
According to the indictment, once inside the bar, local manager Ilir Misini asks the defendants if they had booked where the same responses had been “we have never made reservations”, and they had continued to sit on the roof, in the back of the bar.
The indictment says that the bar manager had now told the late Unakman Uka to deal with the defendants to get them out of the bar, who was offered to the table where they were sitting, in order to leave the club after the same ones had no reservations. The indictment continues that as soon as Uka leaves and enters the club hall, the defendants picked him up from the table and went toward him, where they begin to punch him.
Always in accordance with the indictment, in order to deprive Masar Gerdovci of his life first, had pulled his gun out of his bag and fired it into the direction of the security worker Ndman Uka, who was humble then to avoid hitting.
According to the indictment, Uka to stand up and walk towards the defendants who were at the moment heading towards the exit from the club, suddenly defendant Sheriff Krasniqi, in order to prove by life the gun from Massar Gerdovci and points out twice in the direction of now the deceased and injured in the chest region, and as a result of mass bloodshed from wounds received changes to QUKU.












