The accused driver of “Bechtel-Enka” for the accident with two deaths: I had 30 hours of constant work

Driton Asan, charged with the criminal crime of endangering public traffic, which resulted in two people dead, today granted his own protection, answering defence attorney Ermira Gavazaj Gashi's questions.

Charged Driton Asani exclusively for Calxo. com has given an interview regarding this case.

In legal defender Ermira Gavazaj Gashi's questions, accused Driton Asani stated that”... has often happened to be working overtime, while the critical day that the accident occurred I worked about 30 hours continuously”, further the accused added that Bechtel-Enka company has not provided due forward on the day the accident occurred. As such means of transportation from now on are constantly followed by Kosovo Police.

Further, Driton Asan stated”... the person responsible for transportation is a Turk named Hamit, the same one has given orders for transport”.

State prosecutor Fatos Ajvazi, accused Driton Asan, asked questions about his work experience, and other questions involving the actions of the accused at the site of the accident and the question of whether he took appropriate actions to prevent any eventual danger?

The accused Driton Asani stated that”... with the documentation I possess for driving, I am allowed to run vehicles of a category such as this incident led to”.
Further, accused Driton Asani stressed that” Time when we were working overtime, it was without our will, and we worked under the boss's orders, if we didn't follow these orders, we were sent home, fired from”.

Questions for the accused included representatives of the damaged family, lawyer Ali Kryeziu and lawyer Xhavat Balaj, respectively.

In questions from the high-ranking lawyers, accused Driton Asan said that” as far as long working hours are concerned, we didn't have a folder where to identify access or exit to work, that's what we do in the written records, and that on the day of the accident we didn't have the right forward to obtain transport”

At the conclusion of his statement, accused Driton Asan added that” family members were apologised for the loss of loved ones, the moment the accident took place I cannot see the rationality of how my host was non-vigilent, and careless, so in this case given the size of the transport vehicle and the unequivocal and careless assistance offered in this case I feel myself as a victim”.

In the final address to case prosecutor Fatos Ajvazi stated that” during the trial and management of evidence was unequivocally confirmed that accused Driton Asani in this case has committed the criminal act for which he is charged.

While despite the fact that the expert has left some of his responsibility even to the director of the accident vehicle, the concessions of the late Adem Elshani do not affect the specific criminal responsibility case of the accused”.

The prosecutor further added that both experts have proven the fact that the main cause for the accident is here accused Driton Asani.

As for the extended working hours of 30 hours, the prosecutor stressed that this does not rule out the accused's criminal responsibility, since all incriminating acts exist in the defendant, and the same could refuse orders to continue working in that situation. Since the prosecutor had to know that you're in danger of yourself and others in communication.

At the conclusion of his speech, the prosecutor added that along with the court's main sentence, he will issue additional sentences and obtain permission for driving for the period of five years, so that the same one again undergoes practical and theoretical tests so that there will be increased care in the future.

The damaged family's representative, lawyer Ali Kryeziu, stated that” accepting guilt on the part of the accused, has not only provided for himself legal jurisdictions, but would be a satisphaci for the victim's family, which, despite the outcome of the court hearings, has claimed that it is not guilty of this incident” the damaged party has even filed a rich judicial request”, the lawyer said.

Lawyer Ermira Gavazaj Gashi's defender, in her final address, stated that “we do not wish, nor can we deny the fact that such an action with consequences has taken place, but our goal has been to prove some judicial circumstances, and to establish justice both for the accused side and for the damaged parties, while the accused has repeatedly reiterated the case, but the same one has stressed that he has not had adequate and adequate security that the company has had to offer Echel Eka1>.

Furthermore, the lawyer added that the institutional Prosecution in Prizren should be highlighted. According to Gavazaj Gashi, in spite of the legal obligations the Prosecutor's Office has taken into account the law responsible for the guilty legal cases would have to be Bechtel company Enka as a legal person. According to the defense company Bechtel '% Enka has not offered or secured adequate escorts with police on the day the accident occurred.

At the conclusion of her speech, attorney Ermira Gavazaj Gashi added that” The court must take into account the degree of responsibility, and from all evidence has been proven that it has not been done deliberately or knowingly”.

And as the circumstances of importance that the court should consider is the extended work schedule, the hour when the accident occurred, as well as the very small time and visibility at that time, a matter of defence importance is the failure of security on the part of Bechtel Enka Company.

The company's spokeswoman, Bechtel-Enka, Ela Ruci, has not responded to Calls of Calco journalist. com about the claims of accused Driton Asani and his defence that on the critical day the company had offered him the appropriate escort and that there were 30 hours of work without interruption.

Judge Mehmet Ndekaj set the November 05th for announcing the court's final decision.

According to prosecutor Driton Asani's indictment, it is charged with the date 10,12.2017 around 04:55 on Prizren formerly Gjakova Street, right in the village of Krusha e Vogel, the carelessly risking public traffic, so that by driving the vehicle, when it arrives at the critical site, it takes action without making sure it can endanger other participants in communications, and as a result of its actions, it risks hitting the <x0 vehicle. VW Golf” with the transport vehicle.

The vehicle hits the transporter on the back wheel to the left, and hence the driver of the Adem Elshani vehicle and his passenger Gazmend Gashi, from body injuries, changes lives at the scene.