Voted twice in elections, sentenced to prison

Agreement Mula, accused of misusing voting rights, has been sentenced to a year in prison on bail by the Constitutional Court of Mitrovica. According to the trial pronounced by Judge Burim Ademi, and two members Lidja Vuqorovic and Rafet Ismaili, this prison sentence will not be executed if Mula in the period [...]
Agreement Mula, accused of misusing voting rights, has been sentenced to a year in prison on bail by the Constitutional Court of Mitrovica.
Under the trial pronounced by the chairman of the court, Burim Ademi, and two members Lidja Vuqorovic and Rafet Ismaili, this prison sentence will not be executed unless Mula in the two-year period performs any other criminal act.
Judge Ademi has also announced to the accused Mula that he is entitled to a complaint within the legal term.
Presequently at the session held today at the Mitorvica court accused Pajtim Mula has not pleaded guilty to the criminal act he was charged with, while in the final address he asked the court to be acquitted of the prosecution after, according to him, he did not vote twice.
The Constitutional Prosecutor in Mitrovica accused the defendant of voting in the June 8th 2014 elections at the “Mugen” school in the village of Klladernica, in early parliamentary elections, has voted as conditional voters, even though he had previously voted as a regular voter at the “school. Skender Skyer”, in the village of Vojnika on Sculere.
With that, Mula was accused of committing criminal work” misusing the right to vote”.
While, after maintaining the trial, the Mitorvica court has declared the high-trial act.
After declaring the indictment, in the brief argument given, Judge Burim Ademi said that following the administration of evidence and maintaining judicial examination, it has proved beyond any doubt given that the accused committed the criminal work he was charged with by the prosecution.
The judge has added that during the terming of the measure and height of the sentence, the Court has taken into account the circumstances that since the period of criminal acts has been committed so far has been periods of four years, and that the accused “is not known as the person who conflicts with law”. /Call. com











