Pacolli hits PAN: Those who on three occasions used the Constitution today were ignoring its decision

AKR chairman Behgjet Pacolli, through a post on his Facebook profile, said the coalition PAN is breaking the Constitution.

He has mentioned three cases when these used the Constitutional Court, while saying that today they do not want to ignore its decision condemning the boycott of sessions as unconstitutional.

This is Pacolli's full post:

PAN, is violating the Constitution with its boycott

Do you violate the Constitution? The PAN, with its protracted boycott of parliamentary sessions?

If we're going to refer to the Constitutional Court's decisions, yes, he has. Read about Rusty No. July 29/2011, score 79, 80, 81, 82, 83 and 84. The decision argues on the basis of the Constitution, the Parliament's regulation why the MP should participate in the plenary hearings and that failure to meet this obligation is violation of the constitution.

Why does the PAN do this? Isn't the Constitution equal for all? This situation leads us back to the conclusion that the Constitutional Court, used politically, has no authority. Today's crisis in Kosovo has a supposedly constitutional cover, which has spurred it. Surprisingly, there is the Constitutional Court called to solve the crisis, which has deepened them. And has created excuses for new crises.

For example, the decision to cut off my mandate in March 2011 was intervention in Kosovo's Parliament activity; the decision not to break Lady Jahjaga's mandate in July 2012, violated an agreement on the election of president by the people and changing the electoral system;

The decision on the government's mandate to establish and elect the Speaker of the Assembly in July 2014 provides excuses for new crises.

Those who in these three cases used the Constitutional Court do not want to ignore its decision that condemns the boycott of sessions as unconstitutional. Bad dancing! !