Medocracy; only counteroper is critical opinion

The world belongs to mediocres. Maybe it's not a difficult topic to experiment with, but it's also comforting to explain some success, or failure equalled by genius heights and the depths of inadequacy. Esseia Medocracy of French philosopher Alain Deneault, a year from the publication, is a sold international book. It should be noted that there are many thoughts and quotations on hundreds of pages. In politics, from Trump to Cyprasi, there is only one extreme center in religion and nails venture, the believing consumer, the dictatorship of good humor. In work without nerve determines the fundamental ability in natural adoption of expression: high quality standards in governance by respecting values of excellence. And in every way, it produces several verb models of use, like knowing how to play, how to sell, how to be a self entrepreneur. So, it says we had no takeover of Bastija, but the attack was carried out: the men took power. Alain Deneault was born in Utues, Kebek, in 1970. His studies focused on the German and French philosophy of the 20th and XX centuries, and especially on the work of philosopher George Simmel

Prof. Deneocule, did you get impressed with this success? Since many people read to you, do you tell them that they are mediocre?

I expected a much closer echo, but this book speaks of a bad social situation that many people accept. So I tried to avoid morals and put points on it. The goal was to show the very strong social pressure that encourages them to remain persons of any sort.

You've been tough on the academic world you belong to. Did anyone feel offended?

Yeah, because they took me away from her. In cycles, my presence is episoded. Less and less university environments are forming an elite who can shed light on the right course to be pursued by the common man. They look like one of the former courts, seeing the results of the research, but some of them are funders. There are many autoscensions, many repeated forms in order to satisfy power.

Have you received <x0/mediocre criticism”?

In the age of the mediocracy, there's no more discussion... thinking follows the streets, we prefer to receive comforting news.

Why should we fear the media?

Because it makes you suffer. It requires people engaged in public services to run, as if it were a private organization, so they are in conflict because they had a different ethics; it requires engineers to design broken objects in order to replace them; it requires doctors to diagnose diseases that could become really dangerous within 130 years... without speaking about marketing manipulation.

The medocracy is the foreground of dictatorships, even sugary?

The dictatorship is maniac, the media is evil. Maniac, because the dictatorship has no doubt about who to decide. Hitler, Mussolini, Tito were extremely visible characters, lured to print in their own words; the mediocracy is perverse because it seeks third authority in persons, enabling them to reverb and act as if it were their own will.

Standard English, is it the official language of the mediocracy?

English management does, it kills English. It's language suicide to speak this language when you're an Anglophon. The world cannot be thought of in its complexity, or any social phenomenon, using a dictionary that is not only useful in the private organization.

Technology, networks, Internet collos, do the media dominate there too?

We need to get in touch with some kind of lexic talking about progress, innovation, excellence. I'm interested in using these tools, but we need to analyze the impact they have on thought, morality and politics. A deliberate use of social and media networks, such as during elections, can make people extremely manipulated.

Is the opposite of mediocrity the superman?

No. The counteroper is critical thinking because he removes the mask from ideology, which is a seemingly scientific issue. And you get a critical-analytic approach to a notion that someone wants to impress on us, for example, the inevitability of selling weapons, or of a new highway.

Are you more optimistic about the future?

Every political effort is between discouragement and hope. And it happens just when the situation is discouraging and it takes courage.

Prepare for Aryan Th. Calcho