Bees That Share Coalitions

Although they had major differences, they decided to stand side by side in the election race. It was Kadri Wessel who extended the invitation to AAK leader Ramush Haradinaj for coalition ties. He even gave it to the prime minister.

For this post Haradinaj has a lot of homesickness since the 100th day he led the government in coalition with former President Ibrahim Rugova's LDK.

Not far away, AAK deputies filled with tear gas topped the head of the Assembly, Kadri Wessel. Wessel had to use security against them.

All of this happened for the only purpose of the opposition to the Demarket Agreement between Kosovo and Montenegro.

This fundamental distinction was initiated by AAK leader Ramush Haradinaj, who slammed the map that defined the border line with this neighbouring country in front of his face.

Murat Meha has been chairman of the State Commission for Marking the Kosovo-Montenegro border line.

The same was opposed by the Initiative for Kosovo and Fatmir Limaj. The initiative had linked a coalition with the AAK since before, at the time when elections were not discussed.

The theme of the demarcation will meet with any incoming government that will even be its priority, wanted or refused. This agreement is closely linked to a very important process of visa liberalisation.

This condition continues to be repeated by senior European Union officials.

However, PDK-AAK-Nisma linked the pre-election coalition.

Given the certified results by the Central Election Commission (KQZ) for early parliamentary elections, the coalition turns out PDK-AAK-Nisma, known as coalition PAN, he won the election. By constitution, this coalition is mandated to form the government, which Ramush Haradinaj of the AAK led, writes Insander.

At the time that this coalition is speaking there are not enough MPs to vote on the Haradinaj government, we are counting on a hypothetical situation.

If the coalition PAN forms the government, how its internal positions will be harmonised because of very opposed positions.

At the time the PDK was in co-governance with the LDK, it fundamentally felt that the Demarketing Agreement with Montenegro should be ratified in the Assembly.

This agreement was reached in August 2015 and has been repeatedly rejected by the opposition.

Haradinaj continues to think that the Demarcing Agreement is incorrect. According to him, if it will come to the helm of the government, the first job it will do is review it. So the head of the Initiative, Fatmir Limaj, thinks.

But the main partner, The PDK has yet to take any other stance on the issue, except what it claimed during the time it was in government with the LDK.

The other dilemma is that the PDK advocates the stance internationals have given regarding demarcation. This suggests that the PDK should choose between maintaining reports with the AAK, as a partner of governance, or maintaining relations with internationals.

Coalition PAN will have other differences

Coalition PAN, in addition to differences over the demarcation, attitudes within the partners are also in terms of forming the Serb majority municipality Association (AKS).

Also, The PDK supported its formation while in government with the LDK.

But PAN's current coalition partners, AAK and Initiative, have flatly rejected it, saying this agreement was unconstitutional, writes Insander.

International table around Association continues. But priority in this case is that this process is not related to visa liberalisation.

Coalition partners are expected to be seen PAN, in case of government formation.

Possible Coalition LAA-Determination Amid Major Differences

Something Similar Expects Possible Coalition LAA-Vetvendosje ( LDK-AKR-Alternative+Vetevendosje).

Vetevendosje, which emerged as the most voted party in early parliamentary elections held on 11 June, has stressed several times that it will not enter the coalition with the PDK. The same is said by coalition parties LAA.

However, given the certificate of parliamentary elections by the CEC, then the coalition PAN does not have enough MPs to vote on the new government.

Under the constitution, the first mandate to form the government is the party that has won the elections, which in this case is the PAN coalition.

But Vetevendosje, since after elections and preliminary results, started negotiations with political parties, disfellowshipped. PDK, to see the possibility of creating government.

The candidate for prime minister from Vetevendosje has called on the LAA coalition to sit down and talk about the new government. Likewise, Kurti had also called on MPs from the coalition PAN, but not the PDK.

Seeing the Coalition The PAN finds it very difficult to provide enough MPs, then the question of who the second mandate belongs has become the most controversial topic recently mentioned.

The president, as the man competent to mandate the formation of the government, has not made it very clear that if the PAN fails, who will give the mandate. Parties that did not win the elections insist it will meet the second party -- in this case Vetevendosje -- writes Insander.

The latter has expressed interest in co-governmenting with the LAA coalition. But in such a situation, even this potential coalition would face major differences.

Once again, the mountains that divide Kosovo and Montenegro will create between the coalition.

The LDK has consistently defended the position that the Demarket Agreement is in order. The prime minister in office, coming from the LDK, had even established two commissions to verify the border line, which appeared the same in both versions.

An international commission was established on this issue, praising that the work of the first commission was in order.

Vetevendosje had sometimes failed to hold the Assembly session, where Demarce would be ratified.

Amid tear gas, assembly security, deputies' arrests, even detentions, the government's goal was not achieved PDK-LDK.

The LDK and Vetevendosje have the opposite stance is for association. During this time, when discussing the possible formation of the coalition between LAA and Vetevendosje, no position has been given as to how these two major and vital topics of decision will be taken.

Attitudes continue to remain the same.