Another Vetevendosje deputy reacts to Visar Ymer

The MP from the Vetevendosje Movement ranks, Xhelal Svecla, has reacted to Vetevendosje leader Visar Ymer, following his statements on divisions within the party. Sfechla has said that she has been asked to hold the headship meeting, and she has been delayed, and her internal democracy does not live by [...]
The MP from the Vetevendosje Movement ranks, Xhelal Svecla, has reacted to Vetevendosje leader Visar Ymer, following his statements on divisions within the party.
Sfechla has said that it has been asked to hold the chairmanship meeting, and it has been delayed, which, according to him, internal democracy does not live by bypassing procedures, meetings, and regulations, broadcast the Index.
MP Sfechla has also said that some individuals want to impose positions on tens of thousands of activists.
This is a full post:
Internal democracy does not live by bypassing procedures, meetings and rules that we have observed every time.
We have sought to hold headship meetings, and they have been postponed or not held. And I guess everyone's been reading that in my letter to headship.
Now we heard on TV how the General Council shouldn't be held now but at another time.
The discussion on the General Council is said to be of no use. And this discussion has never been discussed before at the headship meeting, but we saw it on TV today.
E si. Through so-called consensual ways?
How? Albin doesn't do me, Visari maybe...
Some individuals want to impose positions on tens of thousands of activists. Let these tens of thousands of activists speak to the general council through their delegates, separately through the vote in the Movement's presidential election. And let them be declared: are the owners thereof? Or do they have a right to blackmail?












