Former Ambassador Peci's proposal on how to deal with demarcation

KIPRED Executive Director and former Kosovo Ambassador to the Kingdom of Sweden Lulzim Peci has come up with a proposal that the demarcation agreement be submitted to the Constitutional Court before being sent to Parliament for a vote. Peci has said that the Court would need to consider the consistency of the principle of setting the border on [...]
KIPRED Executive Director and former Kosovo Ambassador to the Kingdom of Sweden Lulzim Peci has come up with a proposal that the demarcation agreement be submitted to the Constitutional Court before being sent to Parliament for a vote.
Peci has said that the Court would have to review the principle of determining the border under cadastral zones with the country's Constitution.
I propose that before the signing agreement is prosecuted, it is forwarded to the Constitutional Court, and the compliance of the command of the border demarcation based on the quatal areas of municipalities with the Constitution is considered, and that the implementation of such a principle does harm our country's territorial integrity. If that's all right, then we don't have anything to discuss.” said Pec on Facebook.
Unlike former Kosovo Ambassador Lulzim Peci through a Facebook post, after the Government sent the State Commission's draft demarcation and border report with Montenegro to the Parliament, it has written that the Bulliqi Commission has brought no evidence that Kosovo's current borders do not match the cadastral borders of the Pec and Decani municipality.
As far as I can understand from the media, the Commission did not bring any evidence that Kosovo's current borders do not match the cadastral borders of the Paris and Decani Paris Committee. If this commission didn't document this noncompliance, then what did it do?










