Safe enough for his signature on Lumez Certificate, but nothing about its composition

He had only proven the authenticity of his signature.

Akek, in the interview for KTV, confirmed that he stands behind his signature in the State Chief of State's administration certificate, which is the only detail that links him to the case in question.

But Akek has not been willing to testify to Lumez's case.

He claimed he doesn't know Alexander Lumez personally, but he knows his father, Nike Lumez, with whom he hasn't worked, but he knows him as a professional colleague.

On the other hand, according to witness decision and testimony Radislav Dimitrijevic has reportedly taken over the fact, saying he had to make lines where he writes criminal rights and instead write economic rights.

But the exam file says otherwise, even here, has been used, even erased, the economic right to mark civil rights.

Dimitrijevic, prior to the prosecution, had found that the candidate had submitted to the exam and completed it on April 24, 1991, but that according to him, exams have often occurred after midnight, which falls on April 25th 1991, and therefore, according to him, the date at the certificate and in the book of giving the Lumez test is 25th.
Meanwhile, April 26th in the verbal process had argued that “this could be my technical error and not something else. ”

But the exam file says he entered the oral exam on April 26th, which has been confirmed by the main witness, Miladin Kostic, whose testimony, according to the prosecution, has been crucial for the closure of prepenal investigations.
Kostic, who was a member of the Judicature Commission in 1990-91, is said to have identified his writing at 5th and 6th and his signature on the third page and on page 4th page of Alexander Lumez's exam file, whose name figures on Zymer Krasniqi's.

Kostic, based on documents presented by the prosecution, had said that according to what he sees, the first time he was left on the exam, where dates 24 April and 26 April were recorded, and according to her in the reprovim he passed it by the 25th or 26th date, which, according to her, is not important.
Lumez himself at the prosecutor has declared that the exam was passed in February, stressing February 25th and 26th 1991.

Until Thursday, he changed his mind, in an interview for Free Europe, claiming he had dropped the test the first time he gave it the second time.
Whatever the case, finding Lumez's name in the book of professional exams shows that even if he submitted it, it cannot be linked to a Judicature exam. vocational evidence has been given by those who have been aiming to work as civil servants.