Kurti, Haxhiu, Cadaj and Topalli turn out for Becir Kalulder Court

The reason for this, according to four MPs, is that Kaluldra has lost credibility for fair and independent judgment, because, as MPs say, he has already made political trial of four Vetevendosje activists (Frasher Krasniqi, Adea Batusha, Father and Arifi and Egzon Haliti), condemning them to 21 years in prison for attacking the Kosovo Parliament's targets, writes Periscopi.

“Since the prosecution and criminal persecution that is being done to us, in the quality of the political representatives of the people of Kosovo, as deputies of the Republic of Kosovo's Parliament, the highest legislative body, which carries constitutional authorisations for exercising sovereignty in the name of the people of the Republic of Kosovo, constituted a political process aimed at wearing criminal procedure. In this criminal case, we as accused by the state camera, practically accused by the indictment's representative, the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina, are subject to criminal procedure according to political orders from the day-to-day agendas of interest groups that today control the state power of the Republic of Kosovo”, said to reason on the request.

MPs argue their actions by saying that the “all actions we have taken are within the function of the Kosovo Republic of Kosovo MP as the scope of MPs elected by the people”.

And their move also reasons with Article 74 of the Constitution of Kosovo, where it says: the “deputies of the Kosovo Parliament exercise their position in the best interest of the Republic of Kosovo and in accordance with this Constitution, the laws and rules of the Assembly procedure”.

“Aday, convinced of our constitutional obligation to protect the best interest of our Republic, our opposition expressed in terms of harmful agreements pertaining to the agreement to establish the “Zajednica” of the so-called Serbian majority Communists and the Agreement on Demarcing the land border with Montenegro, is political action that in this procedure is meant to be penalised through the criminal persecution that is being done against us as deputies of the Republic country's Thirty-two, it says.

“This jury led by Chairman Bekir Kaluldra is the same jury who has carried out a criminal trial procedure against V Movement activists. ENVIDENCE! charged with attacking the Kosovo Assembly. The same head of the court, so Mr. Becir Kaluldra, despite the degradation of the criminal procedure under the indictment represented by the prosecutor of the case, Abdurrahim Islami, on November 20th 2017, for less than 48 hours before the opening of seats for the second round for mayors, has declared the conviction with which activists accused of attacking the Kosovo Assembly. Although the prosecutor's indictment, degraded throughout the process, exposed by the very provative means proposed by the Prosecution, the opposing statements of witnesses, the actual claims by experts made by both internal institutions and international authorities such as the federal FBI bureau, are now swimming facts that constitute circumstances based on suspicion of seemingly inappropriate impartiality and that violate right to a fair judgment. So the very direction of this process by Becir Kalludra and the members of this court made the entire process suspected that it will be conducted according to constitutional standards and according to international human rights instruments for a fair trial. ”

MPs Kurti, Haxhiu, Cadaj-Buypi and Topalli say the judges who have participated in procedural masquerades against VV activists, in the case of the attack on the Assembly, which they consider mounted, have shown political inertism and have testified to power dependence.

Judges who have participated in the procedure masquerade against V Movement activists. SEVENTION! in the mounted case of the attack on the Kosovo Assembly, which has shown their political inertation and caused their bias and dependence on power policy, caused the whole process to be questioned and not simply overlooked the fact that not by chance Bekir Kalundra is the chairman of the juries in both cases involving members of political subject V Movement EVIDENCE! Based on the above-mentioned claims, we consider that the circumstances highlighted in this requirement have legal grounds for our demand to be considered based, so that the reasons highlighted under Article 39, paragraph 3 concerning Article 41, paragraph 2 of the KPP, if because of the procedural barriers it has not been possible to hold judicial examination, for the same reasons of”, it is said in the end. /Periscopi/