Suspected of harassment and obligation, court makes verdict for former Kurti advisor

According to the decision, this measure will last until 31 May 2026, and that Berisha is obliged not to approach the injured Sami Fetahi and Tefik Fetahi at a distance of 100m, reports “Justice Bettim“.

In the event of disrespecting this move, the same will be replaced by detention. The North Police Station, on the other hand, is committed to monitoring this move and informing the court of its implementation.

If those protected by this measure deliberately violate the distance the defendants are forced to respect, the court may condemn the person protected by fine as envisioned in Article 443 of this code”, the verdict says.

The decision is said to have detained the suspect Durim Berisha on 2 May 2026 under suspicion of committing criminal work “impeaching” and of “tasking”.

Prosecutor Paulin Paschk had requested the appointment of the provision for the ban to approach the country or the designated person and that even at the hearing he stood by that request.

The prosecutor had argued that the constitutionally based suspicion on the appointment of this move has been met with the reasoning that on the basis of the damaged side's statements and text content, it has resulted in the defendant's continuing sending messages to those who were damaged, which proves the content of those messages.

The ruling says even in the statement to the police, the defendant has not denied the fact that he has sent textes and no contact with the injured now, with whom he has said he has met the last 2-3 days of March 2026. He claimed to have contacted Sueb Fathain. His actions, however, reportedly reasoned, saying that he wanted to clarify property problems with the injured.

Furthermore, it is said that the defendant has admitted that he was planning to meet with Tefik Fetahin, so taking into account the message sent, forms a suspicion given that the defendant committed the criminal acts he is investigating.

According to the ruling, the defendant is also the son-in-law of the injured, and that the prosecutor has estimated that the appointment of this measure is in the service of preventing the defendant from hiding, preparing or changing random evidence, and preventing the impact on witnesses or on the injured, especially based on the content of the text, where the ongoing defendant of the injury can be subjected to any harm.

Even the circumstances, motives, and environment in which criminal acts are suspected, the prosecution has argued that reports between defendants and the injured are strained.

The Court's ruling says the defendant Berisha has not rejected the prosecution's request for the appointment of a security measure, pledging that he will not commit any criminal acts. At the prosecution's request, Berisha's protector, lawyer Undercim Makolli, was agreed.

Thus, the Court after analyzing the subject paperwork, the statements of the parties found that the condition for determining the detention measure to approach the country or the designated person has been met. It says that if the defendant is found in full freedom, he could influence the injured -- who has friends and have not yet been heard in this procedure.

In the case in question, the Court stressed that the dignity of the injured has been violated. It says that text messages were sent to the injured with content like: “Insan does not take seriously until the eyes are closed. Quadether, o kush what happened”, “Mula sthi”, “, “imimimim that doesn't leave woman without a shell”, “Zaloga abandons wife and children while htbe keeps ders for treating women with respect, QR how much garbage is today imam<7>, “The most fatal mistake is underestimating the man you pushed to the point where without mercy you no longer save, so you signed your end”, “S soon in the media, news of the imam from Pristina that his children don't get their food“, and so on.

With these actions, the defendant is said to have caused emotional concern, while with the intention of illegally benefiting property for himself or the other person, he uses serious rowing against the injured Sami Fetahi and Tefik Fetahi, to carry out action at the expense of their property, where he initially asks 1,150,000 euros and then 660,000 euros, claiming that these money belongs to him, with the reasoning that the defendant had helped Sami's father in the sale of property and in the prevention of property from someone else, with this case sends back mandatory messages.

Thus, Prosecution Judge Errol Gashi has estimated that setting the ban on approaching the country or the designated person is a decisive measure.