Police interview journalist Baton Haxhiu, cause this statement in debate(VIDEO)

Haxhiu wrote on an op-ed that prosecutor Arian Salihu had authorised his interview, “converting a political analysis into procedural”, reports TheExpress, broadcasts Periscope.

Today, Haxhi said that he was in the investigator, where he was questioned in the quality of the witness.

And what I saw was not just a procedure, but a misunderstanding that took institutional form”, he writes.

Haxhiu had said in Pressing in T7 that citizens should get rid of “of incumbent Prime Minister Albin Kurti, in order to decide or to give 80 mandates in the Assembly, or to withdraw from government.

We've lost a lot in this country and we're dealing with procedures. And this is pathetic. And what I have to say, citizens have to prepare for two things: or let them give the man 80 votes, or let them show that this is not ready to rule, that it doesn't make any sense in”, he said.

Kosovo citizens are playing themselves. Get rid of him in any way. Either you give him 80 votes, or you get him to rule the others, because we're getting tired of”, Haxhi said.

At an invitation he saw the Express newspaper, police ask Hadzi to appear for an interview with the Directorate for Organised Crime and Randies at Pristina's main police station for “questioned the treatment of information”, with a number of cases.

Haxhiu wrote that the two investigators interviewing “were correct” and <x2-professional”, but that the prosecutor who authorized his interview had misread his statement.

And at one point, in a conversation that went beyond the formalization, I was told this subject was initiated by the prosecutor. And that it was a professional duty for them. That's where I felt regret. Because that was no longer an invitation issue. It was a matter of how my word was read. And when the word is read wrong by a citizen, it's a misunderstanding. When an analyst reads wrong, it's a debate. But when he reads wrong from a prosecutor and returns to procedure, then we have a problem because a prosecutor doesn't have the bad reading luxury”, he wrote.