The chairman of the Supreme Party reacts strongly to the Government for the Jurispudence Commission: Such decision is illegal and controversial

The drill has proved that the chairman of this commission is Aryan Gashi. Gashi is close to power. Where, his brother, Urim Gashi, is a highly appointed public official by Albin Kurti's government. He is now the leader of the board of the public company CRU “Gjakova”. His sister, Spring Berisha-Gashi, is also the official of the Guxo party in Suhareka, the ruling partner of Albin Kurti's Vetevendosje.

Justice Minister Donika Grovalla, at the government's held meeting, had said that this decision comes as a result of the need to address a series of issues counted during the mandate of the current commission, which has affected the credibility of the exam process.

The large number of complaints the Ministry of Justice has accepted shows the need for more consistency in evaluation practices, more unified implementation and adequate application of the test and relevant legal provisions programme, as well as higher transparency and professionalism in rationalising the results”, Gervalla said. Periscope.

The Supreme Court of Kosovo, Feyzullah Rexhepi, has reacted to that decision, voicing concern for the decision.

Rexhepi has reacted sharply following the commission's amendment to the jurisdictional exam.

“Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kosovo expressed his concern about the decision 24/11, on the 2004.26th, taken at the government's recent meeting, about forming a new Commission to give the Jurisprudence Test, justified in claims of lack of transparency, and complaints to the Commission thus far”.

“S first, as chairman of the Commission thus far, I appreciate that it is necessary for any institutional decision making to be based on verified facts, fair procedures and in full respect of the legal competencies of each institution. In this regard, we consider it unacceptable that responsibility for a completely administrative and organisational process to indirectly shift to the Commission, at a time when the Ministry of Justice itself has failed to fulfil its clear legal obligations for organising the” exam, it is said in response.

The president of the Court has indicated that “Tendents to the commission started a year ago, the reasons given by the Justice Minister, to appoint the commission in its new composition, are absurd and not true, and the decision as such is non-legal and anti-unconstitutional”.

The only truth in this middle is that I, as chairman of the Commission and Commission members, have not allowed interference in the Commission's work on the candidate assessment, as this is at the commission's disposal. The Commission's work is based on the provisions of the law, and for that there has been full transparency, the only complaint from the Ministry of Justice in relation to the Commission, which has been told us, has been low credibility. It has been unacceptable for us to lower the evaluation criteria and the Commission to play the role of an instrument in the hands of the Justice Ministry”, it is said further.

Feyzullahu has become aware that the new composition of this commission without completing the mandate of the past commission is government intervention in the justice system.

Therefore, the appointment of a Commission in its new composition, without passing the mandate on to the Commission so far, is not explained differently than interference in the work of independent institutions, and this in the continuation of the ongoing interventions the Government made even in relation to the justice system. To me personally and to members of the Commission of integrity and independence in the exercise of the profession and as a member of the Commission, they are not principles that are written only on paper, but they are principles that we need to exercise in all our actions. We remain committed to rule of law, independent functioning of institutions and protection of public interest”, the response is said to be further.

And this is the proposed new composition of the Juryurisation Commission.

Arian Gashi ? chairman of the Commission while Mr. Ersan Qavolli deputy member and interrogator in criminal, material and procedural law class;

For class: civil, material and procedural rights, Mr. Lumni Salauka, vice president, while Mr. Arsim Hamzaj, deputy member;

For course: Constitutional right and the basis of the judicial system Mrs. Anita Preay-Krasniqi, member, and Mrs. Suada Rama-Hamza, deputy member;

For class: trade rights, labour rights and administrative right Mr. Burim Shala, member, while Mr. Nehat Celaj, deputy member;

For matter: international law and the right of the European Union, Mr. Bujar Muzaqi, member, and Mrs. The Little Lions, deputy. /Periscope/