On the VVA list, but Mimoza Kusari asked for money from the CEC, the Supreme will drop the complaint to the Alternative

The Supreme Court has rejected the complaint of the political subject Alternative, led by Mimoza Kusari-Lila, submitted against the Election Panel's decision on Ances and Parashtesa (PZAP). This political subject has filed complaints with the Supreme Court, with which it disputes the legality of the PZAP and Central Election Commission decision (KQZ), [...]
This political subject has filed a complaint with the Supreme Court, with which it disputes the legality of the PZAP and Central Election Commission's decision (KQZ), for setting out the height of means by the Fund for Support of Political Subjects for the period following the confirmation of early election results for the Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo, held on December 28, 2025.
The political subject alternative has rejected the fact that it was not involved in sharing these tools.
The Supreme Court finds that PZAP acted correctly when it rejected the complaint as illegal, for according to Law No. 08/L-228 for the General Elections in the Republic of Kosovo, P The ZAP has the competence to review only complaints to CEC decisions that are specifically defined by this law. The CEC's decisions involving the separation of funds from the fund for support of political subjects are not included in categories of decisions that could be complained to at PZAP”.
The Supreme Court estimates that neither the Law on Financing Political Subjects provides the right to complaint against CEC's decision to allocate funds, except in cases related to penal provisions.
Even though complaints at PZAP are not allowed for this category of decisions, the political subject is likely to seek judicial protection through other legal procedures envisioned by law, including judicial control of final acts of public organs”.












