Anarchy at the Food Agency ignores KPMSHC decisions, twice attempted to transfer a schoolless audience

Ilir Popaj, who had moved earlier, but the council had sent him back in 2025 with the argument that such an already busy position and the audit official exists.

After a while, however, the heads of the Food Agency had not sat by, but again they made a second decision to have Popane in the Agency, which reports of auditing made based on policy desires.

In the second decision to cancel the audience's transfer, the Council is even more brutal, arguing that the official who has moved to the position of the audience is far from an audience.

The whole process of transferring this civil servant was launched during the time when former Minister Faton Peci was head of the Ministry of Agriculture.

This issue is related to the interior audience of the Food and Veterinary Agency, since internal reports that had drafted that identified serious problems in the agency were displeasing - both Minister Peci.

Peci in a media interview had even been ironic with her work, saying that the “is economist”, forgetting that audiences are either economist or jurist, but not physics or mathematics scientist.

One of the most problematic findings involved what Periscope had reported in place of the money to kill the ticks had been bought for ransom killings.

A scandalous statement: Close to $1 million went waste, instead of the AUV medicine that bought anti-vich medicine.

The KPMSC's recent decision also presents a series of legal violations on the part of the institution, arguing that the Food and Veterinary Agency has not respected the supervisory body's decisions and acted contrary to civil service regulations.

According to the Council's argument, not only has the institution not implemented its first decision to annul the transfer, but it has acted again in the same way by repeating the procedure that had already been declared illegal. This, according to the Council, constitutes direct violations of the legal obligation to implement civil service organisation's decisions.

The decision stresses that the transfer procedure has been made without meeting the basic criteria for the position of the interior audience, a function that requires specific professional qualifications and preparation in the field of auditing. In the concrete case, the Council has concluded that the person proposed for this position does not meet these criteria.

KPMC estimates that such actions violate basic principles of public administration, such as legitimacy, transparency and meritocracy in civil service.

The decision also stresses that public institutions are obliged to implement Council decisions and that failure to comply with them constitutes serious violations of state administration rules. /Periscope.

Minister Peci violates the law, avenges the audience that discovered the “lalic of the lice”