Tawakoli: How could a man who acknowledged the loss of elections in 2000 attempt to gain control over Kosovo? ZPS no testimony point

Following lawyer Luka Misetic, Hashim Thaci's defence lawyer, Nina Tavakoli, received the word. Lawyer Tavakoli, among other things, said the SPS tried to bring Hashim Thaci guilty without evidence, and often appeared to contradict the evidence they presented. “How is it possible that our client then had only 29 [...]
Lawyer Tavakoli, among other things, said the SPS tried to bring Hashim Thaci guilty without evidence, and often appeared to contradict the evidence they presented.
How can our client who was only 29 then lied to them? According to this, the provisional government has been one of the efforts. Thaci has held the prime minister's position, but what real competence did he have to carry out a joint plan to have control over Kosovo, when the international community recognised such a position. He couldn't even send him a letter. U n NMIC in that position he had, because these letters have turned him into an official policy. As Duncan has testified he couldn't sign the KLA denationalisation agreement using the prime minister's title because they refused and were willing to recognise Kosovo and as Kosovo leader. So a title for a state that didn't exist at all. Z The SP claims Thaci made political appointments. However Z The SP has not confirmed beyond reasonable doubt that it personally issued laws and decrees of the provisional civil government. In paragraph 44 of the ZPS file, the ZPS refers to additional documents of those who have been evacuated. These new documents in the sack don't take the Prosecutor's Office anywhere.
Tavakoli said none of the provisional government's decrees have been signed by Thaci, and none of the reports of international organisations related to the provisional government and dealing with tax taxes mention Hashim Thaci, and none of the reports mention the actions of the provisional self-government.
The “The names involved and done are also groundless, we'd refer you to see the evidence... in any case regarding the appointments in question, the prosecution has not proven beyond reasonable suspicion so Schaka proved there were reports or orders given by Thaci for the appointed or opposite persons. No evidence at all about the part Thaci had appointed mayor, so there are only words that someone had said. And those appointments in themselves were not criminal or criminal. It is important to remember that few have had three governments in Kosovo at the time. The interim government, the Bukoshi Government and the Office of the Serbian or Yugoslav Government in Pristina. None of them were legal with 1244, but the prosecution does not claim they were, but says the LDK was the victim of the NKP. The prosecution has a hard time proving when Thaci was real and roley. So it says somewhere he was trying to get political powers, which the S.E. had at the time then”, the lawyer confirmed.
She also asked that “How can a man who agrees to deilitarise the KLA and work constructively with UNMIK after the war in October 2000 conceded defeat in the elections and continued to work hard until he won the elections in 2007, how could such a person seem to be trying to gain control over Kosovo?”
Finally, the lawyer said openly that “we think this is the case and that the SPS is not convincing in what it says and that there is no point of evidence in its arguments”. /Periscopi












