an hour agoThe identity of Lee Rooster is not unknown to us”, Calco.com reacts to false profile and responds to Rama's progress
Periskopi(21 minutes ago)
(21 minutes ago)Calexo.com, the medium whom Jarra is leading, has come up with a response to Facebook profile called The Gaul, which today had numerous reactions, especially the fact that an authorizing opinion with the above name was published in the cell. com some time ago.
Among other things, there was Pristina Chairman Progress Rama, who has requested from the medium “Kallxo.com” and Director Life Jarra to explain who the person behind the “account is The Rooster” flowers, after this medium had published an opinion by author.
He demanded that the institutions and organisations cited clarify the authorship of the profile, possible co-operation with it, the period and the way of engagement, and whether the activity is financed by public funds.
In the reaction you swallow.com is said to be the author's identity with the flowers, but the author of the opinion published in this medium has demanded that the article sent as an opinion issue be published by a nickname.
But the medium says I don't know who's behind Facebook account “The Rooster” flower, stressing that this opinion has been published before postings of false news from the Gaul's Facebook flower profile.
Life-led medium Jarra says no payment or reward is related to this publication.
Part of the reaction:
“ ... to answer the chairman of the Pristina municipality, Rama Progress, for just one more time, we are answering his questions that he sent through a Facebook post:
Who is the author named “The Rooster” flower?
Answer: Author identity with nickname “The Gaul” flower is not unknown to us. The opinion author published in KALLXO.com has demanded that the article sent as an opinion be published by nickname. There have been other occasions, although very rare, when KALLXO.com has published content under the nickname. Again, it was the editorial decision that the article sent with email should be published in the opinion section of 27.08.20 with our nickname but with our editing. But we don't know who's behind Facebook account “The Gaul tree”. We are repeating it, this opinion has been published before the false news posts from the Gaul's Facebook flower profile and no payment or reward is linked to this publication. What other cooperation have Rooster had?
Answer: Unless the opinion is published, there has been no other collaboration with the author of opinion, nor with the facebook the Rooster profile. The assessments and signs of the flowers profile posts on Facebook as false will not be called co-operation, because sometimes we've been attacked because of our work in marking these false posts.
In what period of time has she worked with her, how long has her cooperation lasted, has she/he been paid for her publications, and with what funds has it been paid?
Answer: Publication of opinion has occurred with 27.08.2020. The author of this opinion has neither been paid nor paid in any form at any time, in any way for this publication. The work on editing this opinion is covered with the personal funds of KALLXO.com. Was any politician involved in discussions during the commitment of the Rooster to the publication of “opinions” pro-government?
Answer: No! No, because KALLXO.com was neither, nor was it, did it publish or publish material <x0-pro government”. Not in the AAK's time, not in LDK time, not in PDK time, not in LVV time. You may find it hard to understand and accept it as such, but the work of KALLXO.com is guided, not according to political preferences, but by standards and values that are public and clear to all, except for those who with great insolence change thoughts, assessments and attitudes based on who pays this week or next. Will you apologize to the hundreds of victims of whom I am one of them for the harm that the Gaul profile has caused them?
Answer: No! No, for we do not feel responsible for the actions of either the author of opinion or the posts of the Gaul. Likewise, we do not apologize for the new Asphalet publication. Even though Progress Rama may consider this article as “government” or “against Progress Rama”; although Progress Rama may consider that KALLXO.com should not address the themes that are reported on in our editorials because it has done much for certain BIRN projects, we should remember, even Mr. Rama, but also the opinion, that KALLXO.com works and reports according to the highest professional standards, without any animation or preference, besides public interest”.
