Richard Prosper of “Dit” Z PS: You may not like international witnesses, but they were experts, showing ignorance.

Richard Prosper began with his experience with a diplomat colleague who says that as he commented on ZPSA's closing statements, he said, terrible, so little respect for our profession?

We should look at this matter differently because these comments show arrogance, disrespect, which has actually been present since the beginning of this judgment. Destroying their experiences is unbelievable. It's wrong and it's a gesture of despair for me. It is not surprising that governments suspect the credibility of international tribulats, that when their professionals appear before the court, they reveal what happened and their statements are rejected by persons who have not even been present at the current location, it is a very problematic issue“, Prosper said.

You should respect the role they had, their professions and the states they represent, the US, Britain, NATO and the UN. These people didn't come here to the quality of private persons, to say “but that's how I think of something”. They talked to you, they talked about you, based on their experiences, especially on the name of the institutions they represented. Because the information these people have belongs to relevant institutions. When they gave their views, they were discreet. They had information, military organizations, civilians, reports from NGOs, internal debates, personal findings on the ground, reports from the ground... So they had completely based angles“, he said further.

Thaci's lawyer further said that through this approach, sir. The SP was showing ignorance and the expertise of international witnesses was being despised. /Periscope