Dixon: Court should beware of evidence given to Serbia

Kadri Wessel's lawyer, Rodney Dixon, said the Special Court should be wary of the evidence provided by Serbia. In addition, he said authorities' support for this court should be taken into account, reports “The Justice Trust“. Serbian “Authority and their support for this court should also be taken into account in [...]
Kadri Wessel's lawyer, Rodney Dixon, said the Special Court should be wary of the evidence provided by Serbia.
In addition, he said authorities' support for this court should be taken into account, reports “The Justice Trust“.
Serbian “Authorities and their support for this court should also be taken into account in particular when it comes to forensic purposes for assessing the evidence they have given to the tribunal”, Dixon said.
Lawyer Dixon said it is not fair in an intellectual way to argue that you can bypass Serbian policies.
“As if I highlighted it earlier, in an intellectual sense it is not fair to argue that you can bypass Serbian policies and Serb domination, while it is estimated that the KLA has essentially had the same policy and at the same time say it went in the other direction”, he said.
The lawyer added that Serbia has conducted apartheid in Kosovo, similar to in South Africa. But the difference, according to Dixon, is that Serbia tried to judge those who had suffered under their system, while in South Africa, the perpetrators had pleaded guilty.
Prior to that, Dixon said Kosovo Specialised Chambers (DHSK) in The Hague are important for Kosovo in terms of rule of law.
Kosovo's “Responsis of the TSK for Kosovo is absolutely important for rule of law and future reconciliation, even for such a world country that is not the focus of the world's attention or that does not attract key attention in headlines or key news reports, it is still important to consider all the country's support for this court”, he said./Periscopi/












