Hasan for government attacks on Constitutional: Disturbing How They Are Reasoning

The week we left behind by the Constitutional Court brought down the Law for the State Bureau for verification and confiscation of unwarranted property. Power did not delay long, and it started with attacks on this institution, including Justice Minister Albulen Haxhiu. That, according to former Chairman Enver Hasani, is very disturbing. What does he say?

Speaking in an interview for “KP”, Hasan has indicated that the difference between what was said by the Venice Commission and the Constitutional Court's act of judgment is very small:

The law on what's been done, because it's not all text yet, it's the same reason the Venice Commission has told him. These things, they have days and I have no doubts that the Venice Commission has said and the Constitutional Court's act is 1 percent”.

For him, however, the way power argued the crackdown on this institution, citing the voting approach.

Whatever's disturbing, It's the way you think of hitting a judge, the way you vote. That means nothing. It never shows, either bad or quality, whether it describes the quality of the decision or the report or the inconsistent opinion. Speaking of internal dynamics of the Court, it is the wealth of the Court, is defined by law and constitution, a European standard. This is the first thing, that to me is disturbing. ” He said.

On the other hand, Hasani also spoke of the attacks of Minister Albulen Haxhiu:

The second “, the attacks on the Court, the prime minister's example, the other ministries, but the justice minister, the director of that dictatorship, is supposed to be a lawyer and a little legal arguments granted.

You should have had some respect for your colleague's dignity, your profession, everyone's a lawyer. It's a policy title that's a lawyer, it's a minimum after not stepping on it, and you don't step on it when it comes up with professional arguments and you get why the Constitutional Court is wrong, that's legitimate”