“Path A”, Supreme rejects company demand, paves the way for continued work

The Supreme Court has rejected the construction company's request “Pro&Co Group”, for extraordinary review of the Comercial Court's decision, thus paving the way for the continuation of operations in “Street A”. The Express has secured the Supreme Act on this case, which you may find lower.

The Supreme Court's Act states that the act of the second-instance chamber of the Commercial Court is a fair, legal and reasonable decision. In December of last year, the second-degree Chambers of the Commercial Court had approved complaints of the Pristina and O'S Community's Prosecutor's Office and Interested Parts. “Salla” sh.p.k, allowing work to be launched on this road.

“Rejected as basis for extraordinary review of the court decision, submitted by the plaintiff, “Pro&CO Group” Sh.p.k, headquartered in Gracanica, against the Constitution of the Commercial Court in Pristina, Kom. Goat. St. II, number 1725-23 of the date 29.12.23<2>, says the Supreme Act.

The company's claims have been described as groundless, unstable and unconventional.

The Supreme Court considered the other claims of the petitioner, and found that the same were examined by the second degree chamber of the Supreme Court, since it has rightly resulted in unfounded, unstable and unconventional, so both by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court are refused unconventioned and not influential to decide otherwise on this matter from the room of the second instance, as in its act, which turns out to be fair, legal and reason, based on the facts and facts as presented by the parties as in the front of the front, as many as we have in the case, the reasons for the provision of the provision of the interim chamber, as is stated in the provision of the provision of the provision of the interim, the D.

Works for the construction of the <x0 Street A” began at the end of April last year. In October, the first level of the Commercial Court had blocked the works.

The news was made known by Pristina's chairman, Progress Rama through a Facebook note.

Dear citizens, I've just been notified by the media that the first degree of the Commercial Court has been decided on the basis of which it has severely punished the public interest of Pristina citizens, banning the works on Kosovo's most strategic and current project, “The A” Road (Jim Xhema)”, Rama had announced.

He had said the decision is politically influenced by mentioning the name of the judge who had made the decision, Vlora Pacolli, who is the sister of Victory Pacolli, LVV deputy.

Today's “Decision, based fully on political interests and interest groups, which at any cost are trying to block Pristina's transformation, has been taken from, nothing less than VV VV deputy Pacolli, Judge Vlora Pacolli”.

The Comercial Court on October 17th 2023, through its decision-making, has approved the plaintiff request “Pro & CO Group”, sh.p.k., for delaying the execution of the decision issued by Procureing Agent (OSHP), on April 19, 2023, regarding the procurement activity “Construction of the First Part” Road.

However, this decision had been answered, and the Chamber of the Second Stairs of the Commercial Court had decided to turn the case into retrial.

“Such skeletons represent fundamental violations of the contextial procedure provisions that have had an impact on obtaining legal and fair eligibility, so the accepted act, must necessarily be derailed”, said the second degree ruling.

On November 30, 2023 again approved the plaintiff's request “Pro & CO Group”, sh.p.k., for delaying the execution of the decision issued by Procureing Agent (OSHP), on April 19, 2023, regarding the procurement activity “Construction of the First Part” Road.

This decision had been changed by the Chambers of the Second Stairs of the Commercial Court, where it was decided to start operations.

The Chambers of the Second Stairway of the Commercial Court had approved the complaints of Pristina and O's Council Procuratory Organising Organisation as being based on complaints. “Salla” sh.p.k, refusing to load the request of the plaintiff “Pro & CO Group” sh.p.k, for delaying the execution of OSHP's 19 April 2023 decision.