30 minutes agoVV's Abrashi analyses the Constitutional Law on Property Tax: It's a procedure step.
Periskopi(3 years ago)
(3 years ago)VV) MP Artan Abrashi says the Constitutional Court's decision, which has imposed temporary measures for Article 5 of the Law on Property Tax, where the payment of 100 euros and taxes for citizens is a procedural step. Abrashi says that this provision of legal law does not elaborate on the Constitutional Court's final bias. [...]
He considers it early to discuss the matter when there is no final decision. We look at it as it is, a procedural step, a temporary legal measure, which does not elaborate on the final bias of the Constitutional Court. I consider it early to talk about this issue when we have no final decision”, Abrashi told Blic newspaper.
We remember that on Monday, the Constitutional Court suggested that it has imposed temporary measures for Article 5 of the Law on Property Tax, where the payment of 100 euros and taxes is provided for citizens.
Otherwise, the handover of the requirement for assessing the legality of this law was made by AKK director Saban Ibrahimi and the chairman of Prizren, Shacir Totaj, on 24 August of this year.
“Gjykata, unanimously, has decided that (i) the requirement for setting up the provision, regarding the above act, be approved in length until November 30, 2023; and therefore (i) the implementation of Article 5 of Law No.08/L-224 for Change and Fulfilling of Law No. 06/L-005 for Taxation in the Palmy Property and implementation of decisions issued under this article by the top deadline”, the Court's ruling says.
The Constitution has stressed that the municipality is authorised to contest the constitutionality of government laws.
The Court's decision initially explains that based on Article 113 of the Constitution, the municipality is authorised to contest the constitutionality of the laws or acts of government, which violate municipal responsibilities or reduce municipal revenues, in case the corresponding municipality is affected by that law or act. Based on this provision, the petition sender requires assessing the constitutionality of Article 5 of Law No.08/L-224 for Change and Fulfilling of Law No. 06/L-005 for Taxation in real estate. The contested article stipulates that (i) every taxpayer forced to pay real estate tax to 2023, qualify for tax forgiveness; (ii) the sum of duty tax payment for all taxpayers is allowed up to the property bill in 2023, but no more than 100 (100); (ii) the decision to pardon duty on property is made by any municipality of any municipality more than 30 days from the law's access; in order to pay the bill on 203 euros; (ii) the decision to be issued by the municipality of any proxy year for execution; and in order to apply it is responsible for the execution of the property in the 203st year; it is responsible for the execution of the government in the 203st government; it is responsible for the execution of the 203st government.
