O expert DSS with scandalous report on “Podujevo”: Law has been violated, but no contracts abolished

It's been a few weeks since O's expert The EPS releases an expertise report regarding the complaint the company has exercised “Salla” for tender “Exploration of National Road N25, Pristina-Bessi, Luti 0.1.2, 3 and Lot 5.” structures initiated by the Ministry of Infrastructure.

The reason why complaints have been confirmed based on the principles of the Public Procure Law and the duties of the investigative expert, the report is non-professional and controversial. This is because the research expert who has drafted the report, Blerina Huruglica, has not reviewed the main claims of complaint, whether the economic operators who have been granted contracts have been responsible, or not.

Hurley's final opinion has resulted in contradictions for the fact that he has initially assessed that legal violations have been committed, but that he has recommended that the ministry's decision to give the contract remain in force.

Moreover, this OSEP expert has also come out of its jurisdictions, arguing its recommendation not to abolish contracts,” since public interest is greater”.

So this procurement activity has only signed contracts as well as started work, taking into account Public damage and interest which I think is greater if the contract is abolished From this action, how much reassessing and providing access to the OE complainer, so as such, given this fact, the OE complaint about the violations mentioned above I consider that items based, where the complaint qualifies it as partly based while recommending the review panel that decision The AK remains in force. Based on the above-mentioned clarifications, the investigative expert proposes to the review panel that the OE complainer's complaint be partially approved as based, while remaining in force of the Contract Authority”, the final word of the review expert, which he has recorded in the report containing 53 pages, is said. (RAPORTI)

Initially, the complaining company has expressed its facts, claiming that the ministry has violated the law by not allowing it to have access to the documents of companies that have been rewarded with tenders.

<x0.>Expert Noting on OE's claim to be complaining about copyrighted authority violations, I think they're stable, because the AK is looking for access to OE's bid recommended with the same date of reporting B58 so 31.05.2023, and that's also by attempting OE complainer and e-mail by the date. 01.06.2023, that's the last date at 02.2023.2023 since it hasn't issued a authorization and a disk server has been asked for the first thought, the first time.

Yes, the expert has confirmed even the ministry's most flagrant breach, which has not suspended the tender, when the economic operator has filed a complaint in O The EPS, but it has been processed with contract signatures.

“Check the following claim, regarding the signing of the contract, the examiner after reviewing and reviewing the subject records on e-procure dates, explains that, the AK in the e-procure first with the date 31.05.2023 publishes the verdict announcement, then with the date 09.06.2023 published the contract's announcement, then note that the contracts were signed by 19,06.203, while the Ankes at O. The spread has been submitted by 1506.23, as such a claim is found based on the fact that no activity has been suspended, as well as contracts” signed.

Since the complaining company has not been allowed access to the bidding documents of the companies recommended for the contract, which it has suspected would not meet the requirements, the company in its complaint had indicated the winners have not met any of the tender file requirements.

In fact, this has also been the highlight of the complaint, and the same expert has not considered it at all.

And I'm saying that, as opposed to the fact that OE complainer didn't possess access, but as a research expert, I don't have the ability to secure access. So in terms of OE claims by the complainer for considering the offers of recommended economic operators, for which has no concrete claims in a complaint that might be considered, as well as given that the same is eliminated, as I can't give thought to”, the expert wrote.

So it has found that there are no concrete claims in the complaint, so it hasn't examined them, which turns out unverried for the fact that within the report the expert presented are dozens of concrete claims. For example, one of them.

The expert has had to take all offers and see whether the companies have met the requirements. That would take a few more weeks, but he had a legal obligation to do it.

All in the end, the expert has found that “this procurement activity has already signed contracts as well as started the work, took into account the damage and public interest which I think is greater if the contract is abolished by this action, than the re-evaluation and giving access to OE complainer, so as such, based on this fact, the claim of OE complainers regarding the violations mentioned as being considered above I consider them to be based, where the complaint qualified as partly based as the panel I recommend that the decision is considered. AK to remain in force”

Although the expert has given his final word remains in the hands of the panel to decide on this expertise.

On the other hand, the expert has ascertained violations by the procurement office, but has not recommended that procurement license be obtained from the leader, Nexhat Krasniqi, who has led this procurement activity. Conform The LPP has been in its competence to make such a recommendation to the panel. But such a decision can be made by the panel without its recommendation.

Periscope has made a series of reports concerning this procurement procedure, for violating the law on the part of the ministry. Meanwhile, just a few days ago, Special Procurua received this subject in treatment.

Law violations by the ministry, which is headed by Lieburn Aliu and his deputy, Hysen Durmishi, has confirmed Public Procure Regulatory Commission NIX. / Periscope %m. B/