Haxhiu attacks Constitutional Court after being rejected Law for Prosecutorial Council

Haxhiu has led attacks on the Constitutional Court, saying that for them it is the personal interest of some KKP members rather than general interest”

We have not acted on our own, but we have consulted one of the most respected bodies of the Venice Commission, as we do for the MD initiatives. We are aware of the independence of the justice system, such as that Prosecutorial or Judiciary.

We have been aiming to make a law that ensures that the KKP has pluralistic composition and is able to exercise its constitutional competencies, rather than capture or violate the independence of the prosecutorial system, as interpreted by some political parties.

We haven't yet accepted the indictment, but according to the announcement we wanted to inform you of our views and arguments on these findings.

It is paradoxical for us how the Court at the first point finds that the current composition of the KKP is corporate.

But at the last point, it says that you can't have your mandate interrupted according to the lot we've seen before. For the Constitutional Court, more important is the personal interest of some members of the KKP and not all but some of them, than general interest and the ban on corruption at an important institution”, Haxhiu has said.

She has further said it is absurd even the interpretation that the Constitution has made to international standards, which she says was meant to prevent reform in justice.

After the announcement, the delegation of a non-professor member by the ombudsman has been found unconstitutional and this is surprising to us.

The failure also lies in the court's incorrect interpretation of international standards and in observing constitutional provisions in order to prevent reform in justice.

To negate such an important law is said to be contrary to the constitution, while the Venice Commission has assessed that it is in line with international standards.

We are cut off from the democratic world and unity of international standards when it comes to obstructing reform in justice. So we have a separate interpretation from a Constitution that breaks up the international standard”, Haxhiu said away.