International Accords failure, experts: Citizens at Work

The Kosovo Assembly has ratified no international agreement, as a result of its opposition. Political recognisers in the country are praising that, in terms of the state's profit, international agreements are not good at blocking. But according to them, bringing the opposition to this issue is the opposition's allowed action. Political analyst Shemsy Jashari said power [...]
The Kosovo Assembly has ratified no international agreement, as a result of its opposition. Political recognisers in the country are praising that, in terms of the state's profit, international agreements are not good at blocking. But according to them, bringing the opposition to this issue is the opposition's allowed action.
Political analyst Shemsy Jashari said power has shown aggressive approaches to the opposition, not supporting any initiative they take.
For that, he says the Government must also create space to support the opposition. All of this, he says, is affecting the opposition from being tolerant of the demands of power.
“If we look in terms of opposition rules, it's an independent opposition move. If we look at the profit of the state, no international agreement is good enough to be blocked. What it takes is that power, create space, seek to do more to get the support of the opposition. We have seen a beautiful aggressive approach to power against the opposition, in any initiative that the opposition takes positions without good reason and refuses even by boycotting session”.
The “therefore cannot be expected by the opposition to be either tolerant but also to print their dice, their initiatives as much as they are reasonable and legitimate. To have the opposition's support, I think the position has to do more in the sense of offering that about topics that have to do right with the state and it's not political cigar not to take advantage of the power of the vote itself to block”, he said.
Jashari has said it is very important to vote these agreements on the fact that the country receives funds from them and their failure to vote according to him means lack of investment.
It is very important to vote on the fact that most of these international agreements have funds that are approved for Kosovo, and their voting does not mean lack of investment, lack of financial support. It's very important that this one be voted in, but again I say that position must create conditions not to belittle the opposition, not to take actions that force the opposition to take these” actions, he said.
Lawyer Tome Gashi has said the opposition's role is to criticise power, but according to him, when it comes to international agreement their opposition failure is at the expense of the country.
He has said the opposition is not voting international agreements, which total about 300m euros just because of the political struggle with power, the EO reports.
The subcommittee is tasked with criticising the power to make the power better, but not voting the laws that have to do with international issues, and therefore it is impossible to deliver the donation of about 300m euros, believes it is on Kosovo's bull. Of course, the political struggle in parliament is natural because we live in democracy, but when it comes to voting or voting certain laws that we receive in these donations in many of the 300m euros, I believe that the fact that we're not taking these amounts of money that are dedicated to Kosovo for different areas of development of our state then is that the opposition is making a mistake on purpose or by chance because of the political war that has the constitutional position.
Kosovo lost about 300m euros, which are international donations and no longer the opposition vote, then it is impossible to vote on these laws because more than 2/3 of Kosovo Assembly deputies -- which is to vote on more than 80 deputies”, he said. / EO/












