Court of Appeals Makes Decision for Nuredin Lushtaku

The decision to establish the first-degree decision concerning the appointment of the detention measure against the three defendants as top has been taken by the Court of Appeals on 20 July 2022, reports the “JusticeBettim”.

Such a move was imposed because of the suspicion given that the same people committed criminal work “The attack on the official person”, while Faton and Arif Lushtaku were suspected of committing criminal acts “retaining control or unauthorized possession of the weapon” and criminal work “Using dangerous weapons or tool” in real union with previous criminal work.

The verdict, provided by “Justice Vow”, is said to have filed complaints against this legal-line action against defendant Faton Lushtaku's defender, lawyer Agron Hoti because of the key violations of the provisions of KPP's Article 187 and the error and incomplete confirmation of the actual situation.

Lawyer Hoti in the submitted complaint has proposed that any alternative measures be changed and the defendant be protected in freedom, or that any alternative measures be established.

The same stresses that the reasons for the detention assignment do not exist, as according to him, there would have to be evidence proving the artificial basis that the defendant committed criminal acts.

He had added that police have received all the evidence and statements of witnesses, so the danger of hiding evidence or influence in witnesses does not exist, as the defendant has promised he will respond to calls, and there is no danger of influence in hiding, or forging evidence.

The claims of defender Hoti are said to have acted by provoking the situation and getting it out of control, endangering the lives of those present.

There is no danger of repetition either because there is no evidence that would incriminate the defendant. Therefore, in view of the personal circumstances of the defendants like family, he proposes as higher”, the appeal ruling concerning the complaints.

Similarly, defendant Nuredin Lushtaku's defender, lawyer Artan Kerin, has filed complaints against the ruling, proposing that complaints be approved, and that indictees cease the detention measure.

The lawyer, Kerkin, opposes the existence of well-founded suspicion, and especially the criminal act of weapons holding, since during personal control, no weapons have been found, and that of the defendant's house. “Defense, elaborizes her claims that there is no evidence that Officer Mergim Geci has been injured because of the Lushtaku brothers' gun shooting, and neither of the witnesses present (copes) have claimed that the people in the car have been watching the event, or have been involved”, the appeal ruling concerning the complaints.