Polaska: In Wessel's case, the Special gave the upper hand to constitutional version in the Serbian language

He, he said it happened since the constitutional panel of Specialised Chambers has given constitutional superiority to the version of the constitution in the Serbian language, despite the fact that it offers less rights.

In Wessel's case, a greater offense has occurred. The constitutional panel of Specialised Chambers has given constitutional supremacy, version of the constitution in the Serbian language, despite the fact that this version offers less rights”, said Pallaska in Rubikon

The package has explained how this process turned out:

” are watched at all three official languages”.

” Kadri Wessel in his constitutional request has filed several claims for violating Article 33 of the Constitution of Kosovo, which stipulates: that no one can be charged or convicted of a criminal offence, which the scika was a criminal offense at the time of carrying out”.

” In English-language version, which is a source version, you expect this provision to be applied, in the action phase, or even in the punishment. So it's also in Albanian”.

”E, while in Serbian version, according to all likelihood of some error, says: Nobody can be punished, excludes the accusation phase. Even in order to declare the request as premature unacceptable, that it is being raised in the accusation phase, not in the period when it is convicted, the DHS constitutional panel gives constitutional advantage to the constitutional version -- Serbianly, violating the basic principles of interpreting constitutional norms”.