23 minutes agoKica ílili: I expected the property seizure bill to be withdrawn.
Periskopi(4 years ago)
(4 years ago)The MP from the list ranks “Gux” said that, in principle, it is not against the bill for the seizure of unwarrantable property, but not in the current form the deputy position, Doarsa Kica Xheli, from the ranks of the “Gux” list, has indicated its reasons for its abstention, for the bureau and the seizure of [...]
Status MP Doarsa Kica Xhelili from the ranks of the “Gux” list has indicated her reasons for its abstention, for the bureau and the seizure of unjustified property.
According to her, the bill in question has not taken part of the Venice Commission's recommendations, raising concerns about human rights violations.
There are several elements behind the Venice Commission's opinion that affect basic human rights, demonstrate concerns with fundamental human rights. Raises doubts about respecting the minimum human rights standard”, it declared on the “Debat Plus” show.
I have to try to take my role, now it's true I'm a deputy of office, I believe in a necessity for the Bureau for all the problems we have identified, but in parallel I can't keep going, the standard I think we should keep as the Kosovo Assembly”, she added further.
Kica '%seli, has stressed that she has expected the bill, which was adopted in the first reading by the Kosovo Assembly, to pull back, reprocess and then return to the Kosovo Assembly.
According to her, it is important to respect human constitution and rights.
I have been waiting for the bill to be withdrawn to justice, to reopen the processing group, to invite experts, to be invited members of k. Venice, while it's a little difficult, not to go back to zero, but to process that law, and to consider whether we can process Venice's recommendations or not, then come to the Assembly”, Kica Xheli is expressed.
On the other hand, she has said that in principle it is the establishment of a bureau, but it must be done properly.
The reason why I had a abstention was procedure, was the procedural aspect, that I've appreciated having to come back and come back. It wasn't the Bureau's idea in principle, I continue to support this Bureau”, the MP has declared.
Against the adoption of the Bureau of Confiscating Unjustified Wealth in the form it is now, analyst Selim Selimi has also emerged. He has said that with the adoption of this policy bill, he can exploit it for his own interests and for political revenge.
