Emmerson in demand for Wessel's release: The Slavic whale has never met, he worked for the Serbian Secret Service

Wessel's defense recalls that the Special is keeping all the accused in custody, viewing it as alarming.

For an institution that is supposed to adhere to the highest human rights standards, this practice is not simply miserable “”. It's alarming”, it's written in a request published Monday.

Wessel's defence, led by Emmerson, also considers the way the Special views the role of the Kosovo Police.

“A key part of this court case has to do with the wrong meaning, from lower courts, the role of the Kosovo Police in the process of determining whether provisional release should be granted. Unlike international courts, The DHSK is a local court. Kosovo police are not the organ of a third state, and concepts such as entrepreneurship or familiaration are not applicable”, says Wessel's attorneys' request.

According to Special Court College Protection, it violated several articles of the European Convention for Human Rights, and specifically Article 5 “by failing to make a quick decision about continuing Mr. Wessel”

Wessel's defence mentions Nazim Blace, whose charges seem to constitute charges against the former prime minister. Emmerson complained that Apel denied Wessel the right to controversial procedures concerning Nazim Blace's claims, where even here, according to the defence, the article was violated by the European Convention on Human Rights.

“The shield recalls the setting below on this matter: • [ REDECT], Mr. Nazim Blace, among other things, claimed that he and others who acted as members of SHIK were involved in witness incidents, intervention and intimidation. [ Footnote] REDECT]. This claim has never been tested in a court process. Moreover, on his own account, [ REDECT]. During the trial in 2012, three witnesses (including Mr. Wessel's sworn oath that Mr. Blace has never been a member or in any way connected to SHIK. Mr. Blace was unable to answer detailed questions on top structures or SHIK organisation. That's what Mr. The whale he had never met Mr. Wessel” says the release request.

Furthermore, Blace was reportedly found to be a paid associate of the Serbian secret service.

The “include SHIK in the indictment killings, the District Court concluded that given evidence that this was possible, this had not been proven beyond reasonable suspicion. A few years later, in 2019, investigative journalists discovered documents showing that Mr. Blace was a paid and provocative informant who worked for the Serbian secret service”, said the request. It said that even after that, the ZPS had accepted Blace's accusations.

The Appeals School made a series of material and legal babes. First, he engaged in an analysis of the P592/11 Act concerning Mr. Blace and its supposed SHIK membership have far exceeded the subject of appeal revision. The judge of the preliminary procedure never took into account the P592/11 Act in light of the question if Mr. Blace had ever been a member of SHIK. He simply noted: that the District Court in Pristina/Pristina deemed it possible that the SHIK was involved in committing three counts of serious murder, attempted kidnapping, respectively attempted serious murder, even though the court could not make such a conclusion beyond reasonable suspicion”, argues Wessel's defence.

Wessel's lawyers find that “Appeals Color was mistaken when he found it impossible to consider Serbian-language documents” regarding published documents arguing that Blace was an associate of the Serbian secret service.

The defence also estimates that the Special is underestimating the role of the Kosovo Police, which has offered some guarantee measures in the event of Veselin “'s parole to avoid any further suspicion”.

Thus, the Defense requires that the Special Court of Appeals accept this request and release Wessel temporarily, accompanying it to any condition he deems necessary and proportional.