Parliament chose for O Board members Kurti Government Preparasists

The board's chairman is Vjosa Gradinaj-Menjuni, while members Nita Bata, Kimete Gashi, Vedat Peterqoj and Agon Ramadani.

Similarly, Prime Minister Albin Kurti said they have exercised the discretion of selecting OSHP candidates for board, as the commission has been dissatisfied with candidates that have applied.

The point is that the commission was dissatisfied with candidates who have applied, whether in terms of their professional experience and professionalism in preparing candidacy. In that sense, the commission had recommended that the government exercise the discretion in selecting candidates according to the right it is entitled to. This has been accepted and we have exercised our guaranteed competence by law and have voted the candidate list”, the prime minister said when he called for a candidate vote.

Among the names the Government sent yesterday for the vote, two of the voters had scores at least, one at the most, given the provision of the CV assessment that had made a government-elect commission for selection and orientation of candidates that have been competing.

So out of a total of 22 candidates, voted by the Parliament, Kimete Gashi had a score at least 3.2, the previous one was OSHP's new president, Vjosa Gradinaj-Grhuni, with 3.6 points, while the other voter member, Vedat Peterqoi, was the first on the list, with 8.8 points overall.

Periscope has found that two names voted were not part of the Board and OSHP's competition for members. It's Nita Bata and Agon Ramadani.

The government on December 10th, 2021, had announced competition for chairmanship and four members of the Procureing Organisation Board.

On January 12, 2022, according to decision No. 0354, the government has established the Election Commission for recommending candidates for chairmanship and four members of the OSHP board. A total of twenty-five candidates had been applied in this competition.

On January 20, 2022, the Electoral Commission had submitted the work report to Government, where it praised candidates who had applied. Candidates have been assessed and targeted taking into account work experience, the CV and the motivating letter. A total of twenty-two candidates had passed that assessment, while three had not been posted at all.

The Electoral Commission had compiled the list by twenty-two-two candidates, scoring by 8.8 points that the most successful candidate of up to 3.2 points has been posted with at least one point, which has subsequently resulted in Kimete Gashi voting by VV deputies.

Having this list of names, the Government has decided to add three more names to the list, which have been voted by the executive for the proceedings to inform me. So the government has ruled out competition procedures. Two “parachutists” have also resulted in a vote from the Parliament.

Organization, INPO through request for access to public documents had requested application documentation for all candidates who have competed, including the relevant documentation of the three candidates who have been placed on the list under the government's “discretion”. By analyzing INPO documents, it finds that most of the documents provided by these candidates date March 09st, 2022, exactly the same date when the Government sends the list of ten elected candidates to the country.

By analyzing the applications of three candidates who have never competed, INPO finds that two of them lack motivational letters as the important criterion of the assessment applied by the Election Commission, as well as what is most important these three candidates in their résumés and in evidence offered for work experience have no experience in the field of public procurement.

The INPO has estimated that the bypasses of candidates who have been competing and by the Election Commission have been positioned more than the elected candidates, as well as the introduction to the list of persons who have not participated in the competition at all is a serious violation of the practice followed so far in the process of recruiting the chairman and members of the Procuratory Organisation board, seriously violate the principles of equality, competition and meritocracy, and, as such as the whole process, made partial and political subjective.

By contrast, the Procuration Observation Organisation was without a governing board since 31 March 2021, after it had expired. Since that time until now, hundreds of complaints have been filed in this body, and in the absence of the board they have not been able to handle. Many capital projects have thus been blocked, ports dealing with maintenance and supply, for which institutions in some cases for the same procurement procedures have been binding contracts on negotiation, in some cases even regular contracts by bypassing the OSHP. / P ERISCOPI/