Albin to Kim: An Interview We Saw

A review of contextless figures, generalisations on concrete issues, metaphors instead of government positions, would be the emphasis of Prime Minister Kurti's interview on the Cem Peka Live show. - Bank: Periscope- Here, we're going to stop at Kurt's strange approach to be interviewed only by non-state media. Now, this is [...]
A review of contextless figures, generalisations on concrete issues, metaphors instead of government positions, would be the emphasis of Prime Minister Kurti's interview on the Cem Peka Live show.
- Bank: Periscopi-
Here, we'll stop at Kurt's strange approach to interview only by non-state media. Already, that has become his standard. We will also stop in interpretations of his answers, since those answers have been heard over the years, in various arrangements. Everything was the same, including Kurti's central obsession since it sits in the prime minister's chair of self-pity for anything that happens in Kosovo.
Last night at Chim, Kurt continued his crystal game of the tinwork that had begun since the end of 2005. Even last night, he reiterated that he had opposed Ahtisaari (who, in fact, did not), that he had opposed decentralisation (which, in fact, was not), that he had opposed the negotiations of the Dialogue (which, in fact, has not been), and, therefore, that he was against the agreements reached by, as Thaci's predecessor said, but that he was not, nor was.
Even last night, Kurt tried to develop a kind of comic media alchemy - that he blamed others for his decisions. And this, no water in the eye. He didn't intend to build an entire system of excuses just to justify himself. According to him, the damage done over the years in Kosovo-Serbia Dialogue cannot be repaired.
But if so, why does it need to be implemented?
Why is there a need to sign guidance for the implementation of harmful agreements? True, Thaci and Mustafa have signed agreements in Brussels, but failed to implement. The inability to implement in reality cost them government loss. Like Thaci, Mustafa and Haradinaj were knocked down, not because of the accession of the agreements, but because of their non-impulation.
Kurt is using another trick: he's insisting on not signing the denial of new agreements, but he's pledging to implement old ones. With this trick you're thinking that you achieve two successes for yourself - to present yourself constructively before international and principled pressures before the local electorate because it's not his fault.
Last night, while responding to Kim, Kurt was convinced that these hypocritical attitudes would buy him enough time to complete his mandate. According to his account, the implementation of already signed agreements will consume at least a year until implementation of what is most problematic, of the Serbian Majority Commission Association, does not come to the agenda at the Brussels table.
Of course, no one better than Kurt today knows that implementing the Association Agreement is inevitable. However, according to last night's responses, this is preferring to be left for the end, hoping that the application of others, such as energy and Targa, will likely create more convenient moments that would help the Kosovo electorate devour the capital fraud more easily. Which, of course, would be his fault.
The collection, what we heard last night must be understood this way: anything that will be applied will not be Kurt's fault, but the predecessors. In the meantime, if pressures on him increase, he already has his next excuse for the electorate and militants: the war in Ukraine, Russia's aggression and the tectonic changes in global geopolitical, the themes he sees in a proper proportion to his intellectual capacity and importance. Thus, under unprecedented world disorder, even the Priory Kurt will be forced to release. As his deputy, Besnik Bislimi: Only the ignorant don't change attitudes when the circumstances change: and where does it mean a greater change of circumstances that would overshadow changing the mind of a political giant like Kurti, than a political cataclysm with Russia in the center?
Even last night, at Kim's, the prime minister sold us a little Gogla shower: he told us he hasn't changed, even though he's changed; he told us he won't change, even though the odds are that he will change again. But he also said something: It is not impossible for today's opposition to win tomorrow's elections. He also said that in the same context, with a dose of the man's catarza, which has obsession to flee from responsibility to internationals and to try to justify it in front of the locals. Therefore, Kurt also told us that if he doesn't get the math he wants with Dialog, the country can go to new elections from which he will not come up as prime minister. Partly because he would not agree, in part because his popularity and organization are in free decline.












