Nasim Haradinaj's lawyer wants his defence declared innocent

At the end of his concluding statement, Nasim Haradinaj's lawyer, Toby Cadman, has called on the court to handle all evidence presented in the judicial process and conclude that his defense is completely innocent. The lawyer of the former KLA War Veterans Organisation [...]
The lawyer of the former deputy chairman of the KLA War Veterans Organisation has said that at none of the prosecution's points, the prosecution has presented sufficient evidence to prove elements of the criminal act.
With this, Haradinaj's defence has completed the presentation of the closing statement before the court at Kosovo's Specialised Chambers in The Hague.
No insufficient evidence has been presented to prove elements of criminal acts. And we ask you to look at the evidence as a whole and carefully and to conclude that he is innocent of each of the points of the indictment. Haradinaj has great confidence in your ability to do this and I have great confidence that you will handle all the evidence that has been presented even by the prosecution and by the defence equally”, Cadman said.
In addition to Haradinaj's lawyer, the closing statement has also presented Hysni Gucati's defence from which all points of the indictment have also been rejected.
The concluding statements have been heard after presenting evidence and witnesses from both sides ended.
A court process to former heads of the KLA War Veterans Organisation will continue tomorrow in The Hague, while former O leaders Friday VL- The KLA will speak before the court.
Hysni Gucati and Nasim Haradinaj were arrested on 25 September 2020, since they are even staying in custody at The Hague.
The flow of documents from the Special, which by a still unknown person have been sent to O'O offices VL- The KLA, and publicisation of this event by the organisation's leaders, is the reason Haradinaj's Gucati is being tried.
Over them are charges of criminal acts against administration of justice, namely obstructing official persons in performing official duties, intimidation of witnesses, revenge and violations of the secret of the procedure.












