How did Albin Kurt break his great promise to his deputies?

With the outbreak of the oil scandal for MPs, the Vetevendosje Movement leading the state, today since morning hours has made efforts to reason before the people, as 6 of its deputies were on the list of the staggering cost of oil for only two months. At least that's how [...]
Vetvendosje deputies' chief, Mrs. Mimoza Kusari-Lila, in today's statement calling it clarification, has shown the chronology of the rule that provided oil for travelling MPs (compensation of expenses) dating back to 2011, when Mr. Jakup Krasniqi was chairman.
Same notice, Mrs. Kusari, speaking on behalf of Vetevendosje deputies, announced they will all give up Willingly Repaying the trips.
By the wordWillingly, The question seems somewhat naive, but it comes naturally: Why didn't the Vetvendosje deputies give up on their own will before the scandal broke out?
“ENVED by the compensation for travel expenses and apply to the Parliament's Headship for revising the decision to compensate MPs”, the same line Vetevendosje later reported, which the MP chief wrote, Ms. Kusari.
Vetevendosje deputies who have reacted to the oil scandal are only of the atrophy for spending public money on travel, while others, mostly have silent ʹ including a small number who reacted and spoke of accountability.
“Move V EVIDENCE! since it exists has demanded that MPs' salaries be reduced as they do not correspond to the country's overall wage level and create a gap between represented and representative”, says Vetevendosje's announcement.
This paragraph, looks like some kind of justification for public opinion (people like to call Vetevendosje), but at the same time, a clear message to all MPs of this party, who broke the party leader Kurti's big promise: that with him at the helm of the government, the abuse of public money will stop.
The ruling party, it seems, seems, has taken a grudge with its MPs, who violated party principles since When she exists.
The last VV paragraph speaks of the state of society built on rules and standards, not on individual definitions”.
Was the individual definition Jakup Krasniqi's decision in 2011? Or was it?Individual definitions Those expensive oil liters of the party's 6th and more MPs paid for with the people's deadlock?












