KMDLNJ: Seeking Transparency and Accountability for Talks with Serbia

The Council for Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms (KMDLNJ) considers dialogue with Serbia to be in full intelligence, as patterns are being circulated in the opinion recently for reaching a final agreement on normalising relations, where the predominantly French-German proposal preferring the two Germanys model. KMDLNJ says [...]
KMDLNJ says the model of two Germanys does not solve the problem between Kosovo and Serbia, but makes it more confusing by prolonging it for a ten-year term.
According to the KMDLNJ, pressures on position and opposition will be added the following days so that a broken and gone agreement can be reached and that there is no solution that provides stability.
“Citizens cannot be set before the act is committed and informed after the agreement is reached. The responsibility for this will be positioned, unopposed by the opposition. No one in this situation should be aiming for the collapse of Kurti 2 government, but must be aimed at ensuring transparency and accountability”, KMDLNJ says.
According to the KMDLNJ, there were frequent visits by citizens of the states of France and Germany who delivered the draft proposal to Prime Minister Kurti in Pristina and Serbian President Vuciq to Belgrade.
At the time Vuciq acknowledged that it is a new framework for talks, Prime Minister Kurti has declared that there is no one to finally admit that, however, is a biased proposal. International pressure has begun to accept this proposal because the next one may be worse, the KMDLNJ points out, adding that blackmail and classical pressure and, in this dishonest fight, the Eurodeputta Violet von Croamon and several others are taking note.
Moreover, KMDLNJ says even civil society is completely passive for the distinction that earlier, during past legislatures, was rightly, noisy for ensuring transparency.
“Let's not talk about how the current position used by all non-violent and violent means was conducted on behalf of ensuring transparency for negotiations. There is no point in the opposition's statement that it does not prevent the negotiation process and will vote on any agreement that is brought to the Assembly without any information on the performance of these talks. The opposition should be cooperative, but must insist on ensuring transparency, because they have promised citizens, in exchange for vote”, the communique concludes.












