From bats, pangolins, or people? These are the theories of the coronary origin.

For the public mind, the tale of the origin of the Coronavirus appears to be carried out: at the end of 2019, someone in the already famous food market in Juan, Wuhan, was infected with the virus by an animal.

Everything else that happened and happened is part of history, with Avid-19s spreading from a crowd of people in the province of Hubei, China, and becoming the pandemic that spread around the world and killed 80 thousand people so far.

The images of a flock of pangolins have appeared on news bulletins that indicate that this animal was the one who infiltrated the virus before it even threatened the animals.

But there is uncertainty about some aspect of the story about the origin of Covid 19 that scientists are trying to find out, including what species conveyed it to humans. They're giving it hard because they know that to stop the next pandemic you have to understand the origin of this.

Professor Stephen Turner of the University of Australia said that the most likely was for the virus to originate with bats.

But that's where his security ends. I follow Periscope from The Guardian.

On the assumption that the virus emerged from the deal of living animals in Wuhan from an interaction between animals and humans, Turner says that “I don't believe this to be the final word. ”

The key to the problem is that information is as good as monitoring,” he said, adding that viruses of this kind were being circulated at any time from the animal kingdom.

The fact that the virsui infected a tiger in a New York zoo shows how viruses can move among different species.

Scientists say it is quite possible that the virus came from bats but first passed through a middle animal in the same shape as Sar's.

An animal involved as a potential middle animal between animals and humans is the pangolin.

This animal was being sold illegally worldwide.

Another study, however, claimed to have rejected pangolins as middlemen because a chain of the first amino acids was now flowing among humans was missing in samples of similar pangolins.

Another theory, however, completely excludes animals and says that the Coronavirus was, in fact, first in humans.

Tests by the first 41 patients with Ovid 19 showed that 27 of them had been directly exposed to the deal in Wuhan. But the same tests found that the first known case of the disease actually hadn't had that exposure.

That may be another reason to question the accepted confession of animals. /Periscope